Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T15:56:42.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Persisting Ideal of Agreement in an Age of Boilerplate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Tal Kastner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay argues that the treatment of boilerplate as a distinct phenomenon in some contract scholarship sheds light on the way we imagine our social relations. In Omri Ben‐Shahar's 2007 compilation, Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, aspects of the traditional meeting‐of‐the‐minds model persist, notwithstanding the move away from this framework indicated by the differentiation of boilerplate from traditional contract. Much boilerplate scholarship is informed by a narrative of agreement as an ideal involving agency, autonomy, and meaningful choice. Thus, in an age in which form language pervades American life, a narrative of genuine agreement continues to frame a conception of contractual relations.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , Summer 2010 , pp. 793 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ahdieh, Robert B. 2006. The Strategy of Boilerplate. Michigan Law Review 104:1033–73.Google Scholar
Baird, Douglas G. 2007. The Boilerplate Puzzle. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 131–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2002. Consenting to Form Contracts. Fordham Law Review 71:627–45.Google Scholar
Bast, Carol. 19941995. A Short History of Boilerplate . Scribes 5:155–56.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian A., and Posner, Richard A. 2007. One‐Sided Contracts in Competitive Consumer Markets. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 3–11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ben‐Shahar, Omri, ed. 2007. Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ben‐Shahar, Omri, and White, James J. 2007. Boilerplate and Economic Power in Auto‐Manufacturing Contracts. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 29–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa. 1996. Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144:1765–821.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Lisa. 1999. The Questionable Empirical Basis of Article 2's Incorporation Strategy: A Preliminary Study. University of Chicago Law Review 66:710–80.Google Scholar
Boardman, Michelle E. 2007. Contra Proferentem: The Allure of Ambiguous Boilerplate. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 176–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., and Gulati, G. Mitu. 2006. Contract as Statute. Michigan Law Review 104:1129–73.Google Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., and Gulati, G. Mitu. 2007. Contract as Statute. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 145–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E. 2007. The Role of Nonprofits in the Production of Boilerplate. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 120–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dent, George W. Jr. 2009. Business Lawyers as Enterprise Architects. Business Lawyer 64:279–328.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Signature Event Context. In Limited Inc, ed. Graff, Gerald, 1–21. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 2008. Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak's Purposive Interpretation in Law. Cardozo Law Review 29:1109–46.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Victor. 2006. Brand New Deal: The Branding Effect of Corporate Deal Structures. Michigan Law Review 104:1581–637.Google Scholar
Flood, John. 2007. Lawyers as Sanctifiers: The Role of Elite Law Firms in International Business Transactions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:35–66.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1965. Contract Law in America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gelpern, Anna, and Gulati, Mitu. 2006. Public Symbol in Private Contract: A Case Study. Washington University Law Review 84:1627–715.Google Scholar
Gillette, Clayton P. 2007. Preapproved Boilerplate. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 95–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilo, David, and Porat, Ariel. 2007. The Unconventional Uses of Transaction Costs. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 66–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1985. Macaulay, Macneil, and the Discovery of Solidarity and Power in Contract Law. Wisconsin Law Review 1985:565–79.Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. 2001. A Comment on Language and Norms in Complex Business Contracting. Chicago-Kent Law Review 77:29–57.Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. 2009. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Lawsuit: A Social Norms Theory of Incomplete Contracts. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 34:191–220.Google Scholar
Hillman, Robert A. 2007. Online Boilerplate: Would Mandatory Web Site Disclosure of e‐Standard Terms Backfire? In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 83–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, Robert A., and Rachlinski, Jeffrey J. 2002. Standard Form Contracting in the Electronic Age. New York University Law Review 77: 429–95.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1897. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review 10:457–78.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard. 1956. Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Jason Scott. 2007. Cooperative Negotiations in the Shadow of Boilerplate. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 12–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, Marcel, and Klausner, Michael. 1997. Standardization and Innovation in Corporate Contracting (or “The Economics of Boilerplate”). Virginia Law Review 83:713–70.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1976. Unconscionability in Standard Forms. California Law Review 64:1151–83.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell. 2003. Bounded Rationality, Standard‐Form Contracts, and Unconscionability. University of Chicago Law Review 70:1203–95.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur Allen. 1970. Contract as Thing. American University Law Review 19:131–57.Google Scholar
Lipshaw, Jeffrey M. 2005. The Bewitchment of Intelligence: Language and Ex‐Post Illusions of Intention. Temple Law Review 78:99–150.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1939. Book Review: The Standardization of Commercial Contracts in English and Continental Law, by O. Prausnitz. Harvard Law Review 52:700–05.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 1963. Non‐Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study. American Sociological Review 28 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 2003. The Real and the Paper Deal: Empirical Pictures of Relationships, Complexity and the Urge for Transparent Simple Rules. Modern Law Review 66 (1): 44–79.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 2005. Klein and the Contradictions of Corporations Law. Berkeley Business Law Journal 2:119–33.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian R. 1980. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian R. 1981. Economic Analysis of Contractual Relations: Its Shortfalls and the Need for a “Rich Classificatory Apparatus.” Northwestern University Law Review 75:1018–63.Google Scholar
Macneil, Ian R. 2000. Relational Contract Theory: Challenges and Queries. Northwestern University Law Review 94:877–907.Google Scholar
Mann, Ronald J. 2007. “Contracting” for Credit. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 106–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marotta‐Wurgler, Florencia. 2007. “Unfair” Dispute Resolution Clauses: Much Ado about Nothing? In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 45–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marotta‐Wurgler, Florencia. 2009. Are “Pay Now, Terms Later” Contracts Worse for Buyers? Evidence from Software License Agreements. Journal of Legal Studies 38:309–43.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2005. The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation. Texas Law Review 83:1581–614.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 2000. Humans, Computers, and Binding Commitment. Indiana Law Journal 75:1125–62.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 2002. Online Standardization and the Integration of Text and Machine. Fordham Law Review 70:1125–46.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 2007. Boilerplate Today: The Rise of Modularity and the Waning of Consent. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 189–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rakoff, Todd D. 1983. Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction. Harvard Law Review 96:1173–284.Google Scholar
Rakoff, Todd D. 2007. The Law and Sociology of Boilerplate. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 200–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riles, Annalise. 2008. The Anti‐Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge, and the Legitimacy of the State. American Journal of Comparative Law 56:605–30.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan and Scott, Robert E. 2003. Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law. Yale Law Journal 113:541–619.Google Scholar
Slawson, W. David. 1971. Standard Form Contracts and Democratic Control of Lawmaking Power. Harvard Law Review 84:529–66.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. 2007. Modularity in Contracts: Boilerplate and Information Flow. In Boilerplate: The Foundation of Market Contracts, ed. Ben‐Shahar, Omri, 163–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Amy Dru. 1998. From Bondage to Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. 2003. The Contract as Social Artifact. Law and Society Review 37:91–136.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bock v. Computer Associates International, Inc., 257 F.3d 700 (7th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
Carnival Cruise Lines v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585 (1991).Google Scholar
Graham v. Scissor‐Tail, 623 P.2d 165 (Cal. 1981).Google Scholar
Hill v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 105 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 (1986).Google Scholar
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Epstein, 516 U.S. 367 (1996).Google Scholar
National Equipment Rental v. Szukhent, 375 U.S. 311 (1964).Google Scholar
Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414 (1968).Google Scholar
Sanger v. Dunn, 3 N.W. 388 (Wis. 1879).Google Scholar
United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203 (1970).Google Scholar
Washington v. Confederated Tribes of Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134 (1980).Google Scholar
Woburn National Bank v. Woods, 89 A. 491 (N.H. 1914).Google Scholar