Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-28gj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:38:10.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spies, Lies, Trials, and Trolls: Political Lawyering against Disinformation and State Surveillance in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2020

Freek van der Vet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although authoritarian states have expanded their tools to surveil citizens and spread disinformation, we know little about how political lawyers have mobilized to resist such covert strategies. Based on semi-structured interviews with Russian lawyers and open-government consultants, this article examines how political lawyers oppose three emerging authoritarian tactics of the Russian government: running disinformation campaigns by “troll factories,” wiretapping, and hiding information on government activities and public services. I find that, despite the repressive legal environment, lawyers have considerable success in developing legal and nonlegal strategies to hold government to account. As autocrats rely on information control to portray themselves as capable leaders, political lawyers and open-government consultants use audits and rankings to undermine political reputations. These findings from Russia may be broadly applicable to new authoritarian states in general.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 407 - 434
Copyright
© 2020 American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank the anonymous reviewers as well as Mariëlle Wijermars for their critical and encouraging comments on earlier versions of this article. I also want to thank Terhi Raikas for helping with translation and transcription work. I am grateful to the lawyers and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives who were interviewed for this study. This research has been funded by the Kone Foundation and Svenska Kulturfonden.

References

REFERENCES

Adler, Nanci. 1993. Victims of Soviet Terror: The Story of the Memorial Movement. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Adler, Nanci. 2004. The Gulag Survivor: Beyond the Soviet System. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Agentstvo Sotsial’noi Informatsii. 2015. “V Peterburge otkrylsya sait ‘Infodozor’, poscyashchennyi informatsionnoi otkrytosti munitipalitetov.” April 15. https://www.asi.org.ru/news/2015/04/15/v-peterburge-otkrylsya-sajt-infodozor-posvyashhennoj-informatsionnoj-otkrytosti-munitsipalitetov/.Google Scholar
Bass, Catriona. 2011. “Letter from St Petersburg: Family Secrets.” Prospect Magazine, December 2. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/world/letter-from-st-petersburg-family-secrets.Google Scholar
BBC Russia. 2015. “Den’gi ‘Fabriki Trollei’ Iz Peterburga Poshli Na Blagotvoritel’nost.’” August 3. http://www.bbc.com/russian/rolling_news/2015/08/150803_rn_internet_trolls_charity.Google Scholar
BBC Russia. 2016. “Duma prinyala zakon o novostnykh agregatorakh.” June 10. https://www.bbc.com/russian/news/2016/06/160610_duma_news_agregator.Google Scholar
Belichenko, Gleb. 2015. “Meet the New Secret Police, Same as the Old Secret Police: Why Russia’s Federal Cops Refuse to Declassify Documents from 80 Years Ago.” Meduza, July 22. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2015/07/22/meet-the-new-secret-police-same-as-the-old-secret-police.Google Scholar
Bogdanova, Elena. 2006. “Obrashcheniya grazhdan v organy vlasti kak opyt ostanivaniya svoikh interesov v uslovnyakh pozdnesovetskogo obshchestvo (1960-e – 1970-e gody).” PhD dissertation, European University at St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A., and Chua, Lynette J.. 2018. “Introduction: Law, Social Movements, and Mobilization across Contexts.” Law & Policy 40, no. 1: 5–9. doi: 10.1111/lapo.12097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Samantha, and Howard, Philip N.. 2017. “Troops, Trolls and Troublemakers: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation.” Working paper no. 2017.12. Computational Propaganda Research Project, University of Oxford. http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/troops-trolls-and-trouble-makers-a-global-inventory-of-organized-social-media-manipulation/.Google Scholar
Brayne, Sarah. 2017. “Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing.” American Sociological Review 82, no. 5: 977–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417725865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryzgalova, Ekaterina. 2016. “Deputaty Poshli Navstrechu Novostnym Agregatoram.” June 13. https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2016/06/14/645179-novostnim-agregatoram.Google Scholar
CCRF (Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation). 2015. “News: On 14 July 2015 the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Made a Ruling in the Case of the Applicability of the ECtHR’s Rulings inside Russia.” July 14. http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/News/Pages/ViewItem.aspx?ParamId=3244.Google Scholar
Center for Democracy and Technology. 2016a. “UK Draft Investigatory Powers Bill Would Not Provide Sufficient Oversight of Surveillance.” Center for Democracy and Technology (blog). January 26. https://cdt.org/insights/uk-draft-investigatory-powers-bill-would-not-provide-sufficient-oversight-of-surveillance/.Google Scholar
Center for Democracy and Technology. 2016b. Investigatory Powers Bill: Written Evidence Submitted by the Center for Democracy & Technology (IPB 36). London: Public Bill Committee. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmpublic/investigatorypowers/Memo/IPB36.htm.Google Scholar
Chelishcheva, Vera. 2016. “Spy Mania 2.0: The Rise in ‘Crimes against the State’ in Russia.” The Guardian, February 24. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/spy-mania-rise-in-crimes-against-state-treason-russia-ukraine.Google Scholar
Chen, Adrian. 2015. “The Agency.” New York Times, June 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html.Google Scholar
Chen, Adrian. 2018. “What Mueller’s Indictment Reveals about Russia’s Internet Research Agency.” The New Yorker, February 17. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-muellers-indictment-reveals-about-russias-internet-research-agency.Google Scholar
Chikov, Pavel, and Gainutdino, Damir. 2016. Rossiya Pod Nablyudeniem. Kazan, Russian Federation: Agora.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2012. “Pragmatic Resistance, Law, and Social Movements in Authoritarian States: The Case of Gay Collective Action in Singapore.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 4: 713–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00515.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Lynette J.. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J.. 2019. “Legal Mobilization and Authoritarianism.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15, no. 1: 355–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-043026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. Memorandum on Surveillance and Oversight Mechanisms in the United Kingdom. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=2919538&SecMode=1&DocId=2375752&Usage=2.Google Scholar
Crotty, Jo, Hall, Sarah Marie, and Ljubownikow, Sergej. 2014. “Post-Soviet Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation: The Impact of the NGO Law.” Europe-Asia Studies 66, no. 8: 1253–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daucé, Françoise. 2015. “The Duality of Coercion in Russia: Cracking down on ‘Foreign Agents.’” Demokratizatsiya 23, no. 1: 57–75.Google Scholar
Dedov, Dmitry. 2019. “The Russian Perspective on Human Rights Protection Online.” In Human Rights, Digital Society and the Law: A Research Companion, edited by Susi, Mart, 384–96. Routledge Research in Human Rights Law. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Digital Report Analytica. 2017. “Yarovaya Law: One Year After” (blog). April 24. https://analytica.digital.report/en/2017/04/24/yarovaya-law-one-year-after/.Google Scholar
Druzin, Bryan, and Gordon, Gregory S.. 2017. “Authoritarianism and the Internet.” Law & Social Inquiry 43, no. 4: 1427–57 https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikke, Geir. 2015. “Resurgent Authoritarianism: The Case of Russia’s New NGO Legislation.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32, no. 2: 103–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flikke, Geir. 2018. “Conflicting Opportunities or Patronal Politics? Restrictive NGO Legislation in Russia 2012–2015.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 4: 564–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1455806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainutdino, Damir, and Chikov, Pavel. 2011. Threats to Internet Freedom in Russia 2008–2011. An Independent Survey. Kazan, Russian Federation: Agora. http://agora.rightsinrussia.info/reports/june2011.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. 2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmazhapova, Aleksandra. 2013. “Gde Zhivut Trolli. I kto ikh kormit.” Novayagazeta.ru, September 7. https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2013/09/07/56253-gde-zhivut-trolli-i-kto-ih-kormit.Google Scholar
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2013. “Cracks in the Wall: Challenges to Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 60, no. 2: 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2016. “The Politics of Fear: How Russia’s Rulers Counter Their Rivals.” Russian Politics 1, no. 1: 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobe, Eric, and Salaymeh, Lena. 2016. “Tunisia’s ‘Revolutionary’ Lawyers: From Professional Autonomy to Political Mobilization.” Law & Social Inquiry 41, no. 2: 311–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guriev, Sergei, and Treisman, Daniel. 2015. “How Modern Dictators Survive: An Informational Theory of the New Authoritarianism.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 21136. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Lucien, Karpik, and Feeley, Malcolm. 2007. “The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, edited by Terence, C. Halliday, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, 1–40. Oñati International Series in Law and Society. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Henry, Laura A. 2009. “Redefining Citizenship in Russia: Political and Social Rights.” Problems of Post-Communism 56, no. 6: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Laura A.. 2012. “Complaint-Making as Political Participation in Contemporary Russia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45, nos. 3–4: 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, Loveday. 2011. NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Horvath, Robert. 2012. Putin’s Preventive Counter-Revolution: Post-Soviet Authoritarianism and the Spectre of Velvet Revolution . BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hualing, Fu, and Cullen, Richard. 2008. “Weiquan (Rights Protection) Lawyering in an Authoritarian State: Building a Culture of Public-Interest Lawyering.” The China Journal 59: 111–27.Google Scholar
Hualing, Fu, and Cullen, Richard. 2011. “Climbing the Weiquan Ladder: A Radicalizing Process for Rights-Protection Lawyers.” The China Quarterly 205: 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741010001384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Federation for Human Rights. 2018. “Russia 2012–2018: 50 Anti-Democracy Laws Entered into Force within Last Presidential Mandate.” Worldwide Movement for Human Rights. March 11. https://www.fidh.org/en/region/europe-central-asia/russia/russia-2012-2018-50-anti-democracy-laws-entered-into-force-within.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Maksim. 2013. “Pravitel’stvo Rossii Eshche Porabotaet Skrytno.” Kommersant.ru, May 20. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2192570.Google Scholar
Izvestiya. 2015. “Bolee 500 Blogerov Poluchili Status SMI.” May 27. http://izvestia.ru/news/587005.Google Scholar
Kabanov, Yury, Karyagin, Mikhail, and Romanov, Viacheslav. 2017. “Politics of Open Data in Russia: Regional and Municipal Perspectives.” In E-Democracy for Smart Cities, edited by Vinod Kumar, T. M., 461–86. Advances in Twenty-First Century Human Settlements. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangaspuro, Markku, and Lassila, Jussi. 2012. “Naming the War and Framing the Nation in Russian Public Discussion.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 54, nos. 3–4: 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.2012.11092714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2017. Scorecard Diplomacy: Grading States to Influence Their Reputation and Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108186100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Judith G., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2015. “Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 1: 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendzior, Sarah. 2015. “‘Recognize the Spies’: Transparency and Political Power in Uzbek Cyberspace.” Social Analysis 59, no. 4: 50–65. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2015.590404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisilowski, Maciej. 2015. “The Middlemen: The Legal Profession, the Rule of Law, and Authoritarian Regimes.” Law & Social Inquiry 40, no. 3: 700–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogita!ru. 2014. “Mikhail Suprun i Vlasti RF Otvetili Na Voprosy ESPCh.” Cogita!.ru. July 29. http://www.cogita.ru/cases/arhangelskoe-delo-professora-supruna/mihail-suprun-i-vlasti-rf-otvetili-na-voprosy-espch.Google Scholar
Kolomychenko, Maria. 2018. “Russia Tries More Precise Technology to Block Telegram Messenger.” Reuters, August 30. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-telegram-idUSKCN1LF1ZZ.Google Scholar
Kornya, Anastasiya. 2015. “ESPCh Priznal, Chto Sistema SORM Ne Sootvetsvuet Evropeiskoi Konventsii.” Vedomosti.Ru, December 4. https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2015/12/04/619743-espch-sorm.Google Scholar
Kosinova, Tat’yana. 2014. “ESPCh Kommunitsiruyet Zhalobu Mikhaila Supruna.” Cogita!.ru, January 29. http://www.cogita.ru/cases/arhangelskoe-delo-professora-supruna/espch-kommuniciruet-zhalobu-mihaila-supruna.Google Scholar
Leach, Philip. 2008. “The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights.” European Human Rights Law Review 6: 732–61.Google Scholar
Lenizdat.ru. 2015. “‘Komanda 29’ Pomozhet Pazobrat’sya s Otkrytost’yu Munitsipalitetov.” April 13. lenizdat.ru/articles/1128523/.Google Scholar
Litvinova, Daria. 2015. “Lawmakers Move to Force Russian Media to Report Foreign Funding News.” Moscow Times, October 12. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/lawmakers-move-to-force-russian-media-to-report-foreign-funding/538696.html?utm_source=email_tmt-editorial&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=55-issue-2015-10-13&utm_content=title_1.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C.. 2011. “Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers.” Law & Society Review 45, no. 4: 831–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00458.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lokshina, Tanya. 2016. “Draconian Law Rammed through Russian Parliament.” Human Rights Watch, June 23. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/06/23/draconian-law-rammed-through-russian-parliament.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Rebecca. 2011. “China’s ‘Networked Authoritarianism.’” Journal of Democracy 22, no. 2: 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2011.0033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri. 2016. “Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Judgment of 14 July 2015, No 21-П/2015.” European Constitutional Law Review 12, no. 2: 377–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019616000237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko. 2015. “Blockbuster Strasbourg Judgment on Surveillance in Russia.” EJIL: Talk! December 7. http://www.ejiltalk.org/blockbuster-strasbourg-judgment-on-surveillance-in-russia/.Google Scholar
Moser, Evelyn, and Skripchenko, Anna. 2018. “Russian NGOs and Their Struggle for Legitimacy in the Face of the ‘Foreign Agents’ Law: Surviving in Small Ecologies.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 4: 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1444145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscow Times. 2015. “Russian Internet Watchdog Blocked 4,500 Websites Last Year for ‘Extremism’ | News.” April 29. http://www.themoscowtimes.com/news/article/russian-internet-watchdog-blocked-4500-websites-last-year-for-extremism/520002.html.Google Scholar
Moscow Times. 2018. “Russia’s ‘Big Brother’ Law Enters into Force.” July 1. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/07/01/russias-big-brother-law-enters-into-force-a62066.Google Scholar
Mostovshchikov, Egor. 2015. “‘There’s No Such Thing as an Accidental Repost’: How Russia Punishes People for Likes, Retweets, and Selfies.” Meduza, February 9. https://meduza.io/en/feature/2015/02/09/there-s-no-such-thing-as-an-accidental-repost.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. “Mobilising the Law in an Authoritarian State: The Legal Complex in Contemporary Egypt.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, edited by Terence, C. Halliday, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, 193–218. Oñati International Series in Law and Society. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2014. “Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10, no. 1: 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muravyeva, Marianna. 2017. “Conservative Jurisprudence and the Russian State.” Europe-Asia Studies 69, no. 8: 1145–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1377504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesossi, Elisa. 2015. “Political Opportunities in Non-Democracies: The Case of Chinese Weiquan Lawyers.” International Journal of Human Rights 19, no. 7: 961–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Government Partnership. 2012. “Update on Russia | Open Government Partnership.” December 21. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/update-on-russia.Google Scholar
Pallin, Carolina Vendil. 2017. “Internet Control through Ownership: The Case of Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 33, no. 1: 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1121712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlov, Ivan. 2013. “Russia Moves towards ‘Sovereign Openness.’” Open Government Partnership, May 23. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/russia-moves-towards-sovereign-openness.Google Scholar
Pearce, Katy E., and Kendzior, Sarah. 2012. “Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan.” Journal of Communication 62, no. 2: 283–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01633.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petlyanova, Nina. 2015. “Ya Khochu Zakryt’ Etu Fabriku Lzhi.” Novayagazeta.ru, June 1. https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/06/01/64343-171-ya-hochu-zakryt-etu-fabriku-lzhi-187.Google Scholar
Pils, Eva. 2014. China’s Human Rights Lawyers: Advocacy and Resistance. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhat, Devyani. 2016. Unleashing the Force of Law: Legal Mobilization, National Security, and Basic Freedoms. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Privacy International. 2015. “Zakharov v Russia: A Refresher on How Far Europe Has Come.” https://www.privacyinternational.org/node/688.Google Scholar
Pushkarskaya, Anna. 2013. “Konstitutsionnyi Sud Zapretil Prosrochku Gostain.” Kommersant, January 14. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2104403.Google Scholar
RosBiznesConsulting. 2017. “Sovbez Rossii Poruchil Sozdat’ ‘Nezavisimyi Internet’ Dlya Stran BRIKS.” November 28. https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/28/11/2017/5a1c1db99a794783ba546aca?from=main.Google Scholar
Reporters without Borders. 2014. “Will the Russian Internet Soon Be under Complete Control?” April 18. https://rsf.org/en/news/will-russian-internet-soon-be-under-complete-control.Google Scholar
Reuters. 2017. “Russia’s Putin Signs ‘foreign Agents’ Media Law.” November 25. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-usa-media-restrictions/russias-putin-signs-foreign-agents-media-law-ria-idUSKBN1DP0I2.Google Scholar
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 2018. “Telegram App under the Gun in Russia after Court Ruling.” March 20. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-telegram-messaging-app-under-pressure-fsb-supreme-court/29111309.html.Google Scholar
Rice, Matthew. 2015. “Surveillance: Zakharov v Russia and What It Means for the Investigatory Powers Bill.” OpenDemocracy, December 11. https://www.opendemocracy.net/wfd/matthew-rice/zakharov-v-russia-refresher-on-how-far-europe-has-come.Google Scholar
Rozhkov, Roman, Novyi, Vladislav, and Zanina, Anna. 2018. “Telegram Otpravili Na Blokirovku.” Kommersant.ru, April 14. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3604471.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” University of Chicago Law Review 85: 545–84.Google Scholar
Schimpfössl, Elisabeth, and Yablokov, Ilya. 2014. “Coercion or Conformism? Censorship and Self-Censorship among Russian Media Personalities and Reporters in the 2010s.” Demokratizatsiya (Washington) 22, no. 2: 295–311.Google Scholar
Soldatov, Andrei. 2015. “The Taming of the Internet.” Russian Politics & Law 53, nos. 5–6: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soldatov, Andrei, and Borogan, Irina. 2013. “Russia’s Surveillance State.” World Policy Journal 30, no. 3: 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0740277513506378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soshnikov, Andrei. 2016. “S Politicheskikh Trollei Kremlya Popytayutsya ‘sorvat’ Masku.” BBC Russia, August 15. http://www.bbc.com/russian/features-37083188.Google Scholar
Sperling, Valerie. 2009. Altered States: The Globalization of Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2017. “Activist Lawyers in Post-Tiananmen China.” Law & Social Inquiry 42, no. 1: 234–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, Lisa. 2012. “Advocacy beyond Litigation: Examining Russian NGO Efforts on Implementation of European Court of Human Rights Judgments.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45, nos. 3–4: 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, Lisa. 2014. “Russian NGOs and the European Court of Human Rights: A Spectrum of Approaches to Litigation.” Human Rights Quarterly 36, no. 4: 844–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, Lisa, Sperling, Valerie, and Sayoglu, Melike. 2019. Courting Gender Justice: Russia, Turkey, and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, Waikeung. 2010. “Political Transition and the Rise of Cause Lawyering: The Case of Hong Kong.” Law & Social Inquiry 35, no. 3: 663–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01199.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Team 29. 2017a. “Esli Za Vami Prishli.” http://guide.team29.org/fsb.Google Scholar
Team 29. 2017b. “Informatsionnaya Samooborona. Desyat’ Piremov Zashchity Ot Proslushki i Vzloma.” https://team29.org/keep_privacy/.Google Scholar
Team 29. 2017c. “Kak v Rossii Nakazyvayut za laiki i reposty.” October 1. https://team29.org/story/dislike/.Google Scholar
Team 29. 2017d. “Ol’ga Iz Ol’gina. Komanda 29 Zashchishchaet Moloduyu Mat’ Ot ‘fabriki Trollei.’” Team 29: Cases, Counseling, Histories, February 23. https://team29.org/court/olgino/.Google Scholar
Tsydenova, Nadezhda, and Soldatkin, Vladimir. 2019. “Russian Government Supports Capping IT Companies Foreign Ownership.” Reuters, October 20. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-internet-regulation-government-idUSKBN1WZ0GZ.Google Scholar
Tysiachniouk, Maria, Tulaeva, Svetlana, and Henry, Laura A.. 2018. “Civil Society under the Law ‘On Foreign Agents’: NGO Strategies and Network Transformation.” Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 4: 615–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1463512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vet, Freek. 2014. “Holding on to Legalism: The Politics of Russian Litigation on Torture and Discrimination before the European Court of Human Rights.” Social & Legal Studies 23, no. 3: 361–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vet, Freek. 2017. “In the Shadow of the Ombudsman: Civil Society and the Struggle for an Independent Human Rights Institution in St Petersburg, Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 69, no. 8: 1201–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1372732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vet, Freek. 2018. “‘When They Come for You’ Legal Mobilization in New Authoritarian Russia.” Law & Society Review 52, no. 2: 301–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vet, Freek. 2019. “Imprisoned for a ‘Like’: The Criminal Prosecution of Social Media Users under Authoritarianism.” In Freedom of Expression in Russia’s New Media Sphere, edited by Wijermars, Mariëlle and Lehtisaari, Katja, 248–65. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van der Vet, Freek, and Lyytikäinen, Laura. 2015. “Violence and Human Rights in Russia: How Human Rights Defenders Develop Their Tactics in the Face of Danger, 2005–2013.” International Journal of Human Rights 19, no. 7: 979–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 3: 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Sophia. 2017. “Cause Lawyering in Revolutionary Ukraine.” Journal of Law and Courts 5, no. 2: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System.” American Political Science Review 77, no. 3: 690–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar