Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T07:44:46.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Vertiginous Experience: Historical Ethics and Practice in the Age of Trump

Review products

Tomlins, Christopher. In the Matter of Nat Turner. A Speculative History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2021

Simon Middleton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay considers Christopher Tomlins’ thoughts—as expressed in his In the Matter of Nat Turner: A Speculative History—on historical ethics and practice in the context of recent and ongoing controversies concerning the history of race and slavery in the American past. Tomlins endeavors to recover as much as he can relating to Nat Turner and his mentalité at the time of the infamous 1831 rebellion. He also promises a self-conscious engagement with the creation of history as an intellectual practice, and invites readers to reflect on their standpoint in the histories they create. For Tomlins this practice means a close reading of Turner’s “confession” through the work of social theorists, an approach that will likely prove controversial for some readers. For those who stay with him, however, Tomlins provides a bravura demonstration of historical methodology with implications for current debates and divisions within the wider field.

Type
Review Symposium on Christopher Tomlins’s In the Matter of Nat Turner
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , August 2021 , pp. 894 - 901
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coates, Ta-Nehisi. “The Case of Reparations.” The Atlantic, June 2014.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendell, Steven. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan. “Changing the Narrative: The New History That Was and Is to Come.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 48, no. 3 (2018): 313–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dew, Thomas Roderick. Review of the Debates in the Virginia Legislature of 1831 and 1832. Richmond, 1832. https://archive.org/details/reviewofdebateon00dewt/page/n6/mode/1up.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. In Defense of History. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2000.Google Scholar
Faust, Drew Gilpin. The Ideology of Slavery. Baton Rouge, LA: LSU Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Friedersdorf, Conor. “1776 Honors America’s Diversity in a Way 1619 Does Not.” The Atlantic, January 6, 2020.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. Debt : The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn, NY: Melville House, 2011.Google Scholar
Gray, Thomas Ruffin. The Confessions of Nat Turner. Baltimore: Lucas & Deaver, 1831.Google Scholar
Hannah-Jones, Nikole. “The Idea of America.” New York Times Magazine, August 14, 2019.Google Scholar
Johnson, Michael P. “Denmark Vesey and His Co-Conspirators.” The William and Mary Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2001): 915–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, Alex. “From the Editor’s Desk: 1619 and All That.” The American Historical Review 125, no. 1 (February 2020): xv–xxi; and responses in 125, no. 2 (April 2020): 768–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Translated by Goldhammer, Arthur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockman, Seth. “Slavery and Capitalism.” The Journal of the Civil War Era. https://www.journalofthecivilwarera.org/forum-the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies/the-future-of-civil-war-era-studies-slavery-and-capitalism.Google Scholar
Styron, William. The Confessions of Nat Turner. New York, Penguin Random House, 1967.Google Scholar