Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T18:59:50.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Against progress: Intellectual property and fundamental values in the internet age. By Jessica Silbey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2022. 448 pages, $90.00 hardcover/$30.00 paperback.

Review products

Against progress: Intellectual property and fundamental values in the internet age. By Jessica Silbey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2022. 448 pages, $90.00 hardcover/$30.00 paperback.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Or Cohen-Sasson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
© 2022 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chon, Margaret. 1993. “Postmodern 'Progress': Reconsidering the Copyright and Patent Power.” DePaul Law Review 43: 97146.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael, and Eisenberg, Rebecca. 1998. “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research.” Science 280: 698701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollack, Malla. 2004. “The Democratic Public Domain: Reconnecting the Modern First Amendment and the Original Progress Clause (A.K.A. Copyright and Patent Clause).” Jurimetrics 45: 2340.Google Scholar
Rose, Simone. 2013. “The Supreme Court and Patents: Moving Toward a Postmodern Vision of 'Progress'?Fordham Intellectual Property Media and Entertainment Law Journal 23: 11971247.Google Scholar
Silbey, Jessica. 2015. The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Everyday Intellectual Property. Stanford: Stanford Law Books.Google Scholar
Stallman, Richard. 2013. “Patent Law Is, at Best, Not Worth Keeping.” Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 45: 389399.Google Scholar