Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T21:24:42.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fight to Globalize Labor: Understanding the Role of Activists in the Spread of International Norms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Andrew B. Wolf Open the ORCID record for Andrew B. Wolf [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

International relations scholars have traditionally focused on state-centered accounts of international legal norm development between nations while sociolegal scholars have focused on Weberian notions of occupational authority. This study advances a constructivist sociolegal approach emphasizing activist action as playing a unique role in shaping international norms. Specifically, this study investigates labor activists' intervention in U.S. bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) to examine why labor activists chose to initiate FTA disputes as a social movement tactic and how strategic interaction with international legal systems has helped them institutionalize and proliferate the International Labor Organizations' core labor standards. Through semi-structured interviews with legal, union, and government officials, alongside a content analysis of cases filed under the U.S. FTA system, this study shows the role activists played in advancing “globalized” standards in international law. This study finds that activists spread norms through a gradual mechanism of accretion, which focuses on the creation of standards and international legal standing over the individual outcomes of any given case.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 607 - 642
Copyright
© 2020 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFL-CIO. 2015. “What a New NAFTA Complaint Call Tell Us About the TPP.” AFL-CIO Press Release. http://www.aflcio.org/Blog/Political-Action-Legislation/What-a-New-NAFTA-Complaint-Can-Tell-Us-About-the-TPP accessed 22 December 2015.Google Scholar
AFL-CIO. 2019. “Letter Supporting U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA).” AFL-CIO Legislative Alert. https://aflcio.org/about/advocacy/legislative-alerts/letter-supporting-us-mexico-canada-agreement-usmca accessed 14 July 2020.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2013. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, M. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organization in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2002. The Future of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilder, R. B. 1989. “International Third Party Dispute Settlement.” Denver J. International Law Policy 17: 471–503.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law J. 38: 805.Google Scholar
Boyle, F. A. 1980. “The Irrelevance of International Law.” California Western International Law J.Google Scholar
Brunnee, Jutta and Toope, Stephen. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compa, Lance. 1993. “International Labor Rights and the Sovereignty Question: NAFTA and Guatemala, Two Case Studies.” American University J. of International Law and Policy 117–36.Google Scholar
Compa, Lance. 2001. “NAFTA's Side Labor Agreement and International Labor Solidarity.” Antipode 33: 451–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Joseph A. 2016. “Legitimacy Chains: Legitimation of Compliance with International Courts Across Social Fields.” Law & Society Rev. 50: 154–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Nryant. 1995. “Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from the Competition for Transnational Business Disputes.” Law & Society Rev. 29: 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, William A., Ferguson, John-Paul, and Klett, Erin. 2004. “An Effective Confluence of Forces in Support of Workers' Rights: ILO Standards, US Trade Laws, Unions, and NGOs.” Human Rights Quarterly 26: 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2010. “Is it Labor's Turn to Globalize? Twenty-First Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses.” Global Labour J. 352–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary & Legal Studies. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Graubart, Jonathan. 2008. Legalizing Transnational Activism: The Struggle to Gain Social Change Form NAFTA's Citizen Petitions. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Grayson, George. 1995. The North American Free Trade Agreement: Regional Community and the New World Order. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M., ed.. 1997. Knowledge, Power and International Policy Co-ordination. Columbia, SC: Univ. of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M. 2009. Forced to be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, E. M., LeVeck, Brad L., and Victor, David G. 2016. “How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law.” The J. of Politics 78: 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Lamont, Michèle. 2013. Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terrence C. and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. “The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes.” American J. of Sociology 112: 1135–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, Robert. 2016. “The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary.” European J. of International Law 27: 9–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Tamara. 2005. “Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of NAFTA on Transnational Labor Relationships in North America.” American J. of Sociology 111: 716–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. 1993. “Sovereignty, Interdependence, and International Institutions.” In Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann, edited by Miller, L. B. and Smith, M. J. Westview: Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Kratochwill, F. V. and Ruggie, J. G. 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40: 743–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2005. “American Legal Realism.” In The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, edited by Golding, M. P. and Edmunson, W. A. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1996. “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Directions.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, edited by McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Matthew B. and Huberman, A. Michael. 1994. “Sampling: Bounding the Collection of Data.” In Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed.,. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. 1985. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th ed.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Nolan García, K. A. 2010. “Enforcement by Design: The Legalization of Labor Rights Mechanism in US Trade Policy, No. 207.” In Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas. México, DF.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, Balakrishnan. 2003. International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1999. “Embedding the Global in the National: Implications for the Role of the State.” In States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy, edited by Smith, David Alden, Solinger, Dorothy J., Topik, Steven C., and Topik, Steven. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schachter, O. 1991. International Law in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Marinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Silver, Beverly J. 2003. Forces of Labor: Workers' Movements and Globalization Since 1870. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Guy Fiti. 2017. To Reform the World: International Organizations and the Making of Modern States. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, AM (1995) “International Law in a World of Liberal States,” 6 Er J. International Law 503–38, 6.Google Scholar
Small, Mario. 2009. “‘How Many Cases Do I Need?’ On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” Ethnography 10: 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Erik O. 2000. “Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise.” American J. of Sociology 105: 957–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar