Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:16:59.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the Myth of Formal Equality to the Politics of Social Justice: Race and the Legal Attack on Native Entitlements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Courtenay W. Daum  and
Eric Ishiwata
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how the conservative legal movement's successful countermobilization of the politics of rights enables U.S. Supreme Court outcomes that exacerbate racial and ethnic inequities while solidifying the privileged position of others in the name of equality. A comparison of two pivotal Supreme Court cases involving native entitlements—Morton v. Mancari (1974) and Rice v. Cayetano (2000)—illustrates how appeals to formal, as opposed to substantive, equality work in effect to support existing hierarchies. At the same time, the conservative legal movement's success provides progressive social actors with opportunities to reframe the discourse. We suggest that a critical questioning of strategies predicated on appeals for equal rights may be necessary to advance the interests of native populations in the current environment, and we identify an alternative way of working for native interests, one that escapes the constraints of equality doctrine by appealing to broader claims of social justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 44 , Issue 3-4 , December 2010 , pp. 843 - 876
Copyright
© 2010 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank the organizers of the 2008 “Paradoxes of Race, Law and Inequality Conference”—University of California, Irvine Center in Law, Society and Culture and the Law & Society Review—and the attendees for providing us with an opportunity to share our research and receive valuable feedback. We would also like to thank LSR Editor Carroll Seron, Laura Gómez, and the three anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.

References

References

Ackerman, Robert John (1996) Heterogeneities: Race, Gender, Class, Nation, and State. Amherst, MA: Univ. of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Brigham, John (1988) “Rights, Rage and Remedy: Forms of Law in Political Discourse,” 2 Studies in American Political Development 303–16.Google Scholar
Brigham, John (1996) The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bogard, William (2000) “Smoothing Machines and the Constitution of Society,” 14 Cultural Studies 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Individual Rights (2008) “Civil Rights Today,” http://www.cir-usa.org/civil_rights_theme.html (accessed 14 April 2008).Google Scholar
Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (2005) “The Status of Native Americans in Science and Engineering,” Prepared for the National Academy of Engineering Workshop on Engineering Studies at the Tribal Colleges, http://www.cpst.org/NativeIV.pdf (accessed 29 Sept. 2008).Google Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey (2005) “In the Name of Equal Rights: ‘Special’ Rights and the Politics of Resentment in Post-Civil Rights America,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 723–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudas, Jeffrey (2008) The Cultivation of Resentment: Treaty Rights and the New Right. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa (2003) The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., & Munger, Frank W. (2003) Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans With Disabilities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories From Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1992) “Review: Hollow Hopes, Flypaper and Metaphors,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 745–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Terri Susan (1992) “The Impact of Issue Framing on Public Opinion,” 29 Social Science J. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gerstmann, Evan (1999) The Constitutional Underclass. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Getches, David (2002) Testimony (invited) to U.S. Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs, Hearings on Impact of Recent Supreme Court Decisions on Indian Tribal Sovereignty, 107th Congress, 2nd Sess., 27 Feb.Google Scholar
Giroux, Henry (2001) “‘Something's Missing’: Cultural Studies, Neoliberalism, and the Politics of Educated Hope,” 14 Strategies 227–52.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Carole (2008) “What's Race Got to Do With It? The Story of Morton v. Mancari,” in Moran, R. & Carbado, D., eds., Race Law Stories. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan (2002) The Limits to Union: Same-Sex Marriage and the Politics of Civil Rights. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg-Hiller, Jonathan, & Milner, Neal (2003) “Rights as Excess: Understanding the Politics of Special Rights,” 28 Law & Social Inquiry 1075–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jealous, Benjamin Todd (2009) “President Benjamin Todd Jealous Addresses NAACP National Convention,” http://www.naacp.org/news/press/2009-07-14/index.htm (accessed 1 Nov. 2009).Google Scholar
Katz, Ellen D. (2000) “Race and the Right to Vote after Rice v. Cayetano,” 99 Michigan Law Rev. 491–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauanui, J. Kehaulani (2002) “The Politics of Blood and Sovereignty in Rice v. Cayetano,” 25 PoLAR 110–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauanui, J. Kehaulani (2008) Hawaiian Blood: Colonialism and the Politics of Sovereignty and Indigeneity. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. (2004) The Most Activist Supreme Court in History. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Lisa, & Goldberg, Suzanne B. (1998) Strangers to the Law: Gay People on Trial. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1992) “Review: Reform Litigation on Trial,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 715–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1996) “Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being So Positive …),” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 457–82.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, & Dudas, Jeffrey (2006) “Retrenchment and Resurgence? Mapping the Changing Context of Movement Lawyering in the United States,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S. A., eds., Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Office of Hawaiian Affairs (2006) “2006 Native Hawaiian Data Book,” http://www.oha.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=102Itemid=216 (accessed 1 Oct. 2008).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2003) “Conflicted Views of Affirmative Action,” htpp://www.people-press.org/report/184/conflicted-views-of-affirmative-action (accessed 15 June 2009).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2009) “Public Backs Affirmative Action, But Not Minority Preferences,” http://www.pewresearch.org/pubs/1240/sotomayor-supreme-court-affirmative-action-minority-preferences (accessed 1 July 2009).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1992) “Hollow Hopes and Other Aspirations: A Reply to Feeley and McCann,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 761–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1996) “Review: Positivism, Interpretivism and the Study of Law,” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Noenoe K. (2004) Aloha Betrayed: Native Hawaiian Resistance to American Colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1996) Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, Ann (2008) Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven M. (2008) The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Haunani-Kay (1999) From a Native Daughter: Colonialism and Sovereignty in Hawaii. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawai'i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (2006) “Press Release: Income Climbs, Poverty Stabilizes, Uninsured Rate Increases,” Released 29 Aug., http://www.census.gov/PressRelease/www/releases/archives/income_wealth/007419.html (accessed 29 Sept. 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (2003) “A Quiet Crisis: Federal Funding and Unmet Needs in Indian Country,” http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/na0703/na0731.pdf (accessed 29 Sept. 2008).Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia (1987) “Spirit-Murdering the Messenger: The Discourse of Fingerpointing as the Law's Response to Racism,” 42 University of Miami Law Rev. 127.Google Scholar
Wright, Kai (2009) “At 100, NAACP Shifts Focus From Rights to Justice,” http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=106703086 (accessed 1 Nov. 2009).Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Eric K., & Betts, Catherine Corpus (2008) “Disfiguring Civil Rights to Deny Indigenous Hawaiian Self-Determination,” in Moran, R. & Carbado, D., eds., Race Law Stories. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Alexander v. Louisiana, 405 U.S. 625 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974).Google Scholar
Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973).Google Scholar
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1967).Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971).Google Scholar
Ham v. South Carolina, 409 U.S. 524 (1973).Google Scholar
Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943).Google Scholar
Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (5th Cir.) (1973).Google Scholar
Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, 413 U.S. 189 (1973).Google Scholar
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).Google Scholar
Mancari v. Morton, 359 F. Supp. 585 (D.N.M. 1973).Google Scholar
Morton v. Mancari, 417 U.S. 535 (1974).Google Scholar
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).Google Scholar
Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495 (2000).Google Scholar
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964.Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1968, Pub. L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 73, Apr. 11, 1968.Google Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Act 1972, Pub. L. 92-261, 86 Stat. 103, Mar. 24, 1972.Google Scholar
Hawaiian Homes Commission Act 1920, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 108, July 9, 1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawai'i Statehood Admissions Act 1959, Pub. L. 86-3, 73 Stat. 4, Mar. 18, 1959.Google Scholar
Housing and Community Development Act 1974, Pub. L. 93-383, 88 Stat. 633, Aug. 22, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. § 479, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, June 18, 1934.Google Scholar
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act 1975, Pub. L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203, Jan. 4, 1975.Google Scholar
Proposition 209, Amendment to California Constitution, passed 1996.Google Scholar
Voting Rights Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89-110, 79 Stat. 437, Aug. 6, 1965.Google Scholar