Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:24:37.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ignorance in Bliss: Modeling Knowledge of Rights in Marriage and Cohabitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Pascoe Pleasence  and
Nigel J. Balmer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We live our lives against an extensive backdrop of legal rights and responsibilities, yet a growing number of studies indicates low levels of public legal literacy. In the context of opposite-sex cohabitation and marriage law, this study employs new survey data from the United Kingdom to explore, in detail, how many and which people are ignorant of the law, and what are the nature and origins of erroneous beliefs. We find that people's beliefs about both cohabitation and marriage law are frequently wrong. They are also strikingly similar, and reflect the divergence of social attitudes from the law. Our findings are consistent with the notion that legal literacy links to salience of issue. They are also consistent with recent public legal education initiatives that affected public understanding of cohabitation law, but we argue that social attitudes and the intransigence of erroneous beliefs generally present significant challenges to such initiatives.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 297 - 333
Copyright
© 2012 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Jo Miles, Rebecca Probert, Rebecca Sandefur, Alison Diduck, and the anonymous reviewers at LSR for their insightful comments on earlier drafts of this article. The Civil and Social Justice Panel Survey is funded by the Legal Services Commission of England and Wales.

References

Advice Services Alliance, Citizenship Foundation, Legal Action Group (2004) Towards a National Strategy for Public Legal Education. London: Advice Services Alliance, Citizenship Foundation and Legal Action Group.Google Scholar
Advice Services Alliance, Citizenship Foundation, Legal Action Group (2005) Public Legal Education: A Proposal for Development. London: Advice Services Alliance, Citizenship Foundation and Legal Action Group.Google Scholar
Arthur, Sue, et al. (2002) Settling Up: Making Financial Arrangements after Divorce or Separation. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Avellar, Sarah, & Smock, Pamela (2005) “The Economic Consequences of the Dissolution of Cohabiting Unions,” 67 J. of Marriage and Family 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynn A., & Emery, Robert E. (1993) “When Every Relationship Is Above Average—Perceptions and Expectations of Divorce at the Time of Marriage,” 17 Law and Human Behavior 439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Ann, & Duncan, Simon (2000) “Family Law, Moral Rationalities and New Labour's Communitarianism: Part II,” 22 J. of Social Welfare and Family Law 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Ann, & James, Grace (2004) “Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain,” 67 Modern Law Rev. 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Ann, et al. (2001) “Just a Piece of Paper? Marriage and Cohabitation,” in Park, A., et al., ed., British Social Attitudes: Public Policy, Social Ties—The 18th Report. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Barlow, Ann, et al. (2005) Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Barlow, Ann, et al. (2007) “In Practice: The Living Together Campaign—The Impact on Cohabitants,” 37 Family Law 166–169.Google Scholar
Barlow, Ann, et al. (2008) “Cohabitation and the Law: Myths, Money and the Media,” in Park, A., et al., ed., British Social Attitudes: The 24th Report. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Jen (2011) Households and Families. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics (Social Trends 41).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, Cynthia G. (2010) Unmarried Couples, Law, and Public Policy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Browne, William J. (2009) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.10. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Univ. of Bristol.Google Scholar
Bulloch, Sarah, & Headrick, Debbie (2005) Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison of Legal Provisions for Unmarried Cohabiting Couples. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Casebourne, Jo, et al. (2006) Employment Rights at Work: A Survey of Employees 2005. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Andrew J. (2010) “Demographic Trends in the United States: A Review of Research in the 2000s,” 72 J. of Marriage and Family 403–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, Charles F. (1966) “A Study in Knowledge and Attitudes towards the Law,” 2 Rocky Mountain Social Science J. 192–203.Google Scholar
Darley, John M., Carlsmith, Kevin M., & Robinson, Paul H. (2001) “The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 165–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, John M., Sanderson, Catherine A., & LaMantia, Peter S. (1996) “Community Standards for Defining Attempt: Inconsistencies with the Model Penal Code,” 39 American Behavioral Scientist 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, Ian, & Wasoff, Fran (2007) “Protection, Parity, or Promotion: Public Attitudes to Cohabitation and the Purposes of Legal Reform,” 29 Law and Policy 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Gillian, Pearce, Julia, & Woodward, Hilary (2007) A Failure of Trust: Resolving Property Disputes on Cohabitation Breakdown. Cardiff, Wales: Cardiff Univ. (Cardiff Law School Research Papers No. 1).Google Scholar
Douglas, Gillian, Pearce, Julia, & Woodward, Hilary (2009) “Money, Property, Cohabitation and Separation,” in Miles, J., & Probert, R., eds., Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Dowding, Sally. (2009) “Self-Determination or Judicial Imposition? Miles, J., & Probert, R., eds., Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Duncan, Simon, Barlow, Ann, & James, Grace (2008) “Why Don't They Marry? Cohabitation, Commitment and DIY Marriage,” in Diduck, A., ed., Marriage and Cohabitation: Regulating Intimacy, Affection and Care. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991) Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, Faby M., & Lydon, John E. (2004) “Bias and Accuracy in Close Relationships: An Integrative Review,” 8 Personality and Social Psychology Rev. 322–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, Harvey (2010) Multilevel Statistical Models, 4th ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, Peter M. (1990) “Action Phases and Mindsets,” in Higgins, E.T., & Sorrentino, R.M., eds., Handbook of Motivation and Cognition. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. (2010) “Higher Demand, Lower Supply? A Comparative Assessment of the Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans,” 37 Fordham Urban Law J. 129–156.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mary (2001) “Why Marry? Perceptions of the Affianced,” 31 Family Law 197–207.Google Scholar
Joshi, Pamela, Quane, James M., & Cherlin, Andrew J. (2009) “Contemporary Work and Family Issues Affecting Marriage and Cohabitation among Low-Income Single Mothers,” 58 Family Relations 647–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, Ian (2004) “The Legal Position of Cohabitees in Australia and New Zealand,” 4 International Family Law J. 238–243.Google Scholar
Kiernan, Kathleen (2004) “Unmarried Cohabitation and Parenthood in Britain and Europe,” 26 Law and Policy 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, Kathleen (2006) “Partnership and Parenthood in the UK,” Presented at the National Family and Parenting Institute's Parent Child Conference.Google Scholar
Kiernan, Kathleen, & Smith, Kate (2003) “Unmarried Parenthood: New Insights from the Millennium Cohort Study,” 114 Population Trends 26–33.Google Scholar
Kiernan, Kathleen, et al. (2011) Fragile Families in the U.S. and U.K. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Well-Being, Princeton Univ. (Fragile Families Working Paper WP 11-04-FF).Google Scholar
Kim, Pauline T. (1999) “Norms, Learning, and Law: Exploring the Influences on Workers' Legal Knowledge,” 2 Univ. of Illinois Law Rev. 447–515.Google Scholar
Law Commission (2006) Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown—A Consultation Paper. Norwich, UK: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Law Commission (2007a) Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. Norwich, UK: The Stationery Office (Cm 7182).Google Scholar
Law Commission (2007b) Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown: Executive Summary. London: The Law Commission.Google Scholar
Law Society (2002) Cohabitation: The Case for Clear Law. London: The Law Society.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane (2001) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jane, Tennant, Rosalind, & Taylor, Jean (2009) “Financial Arrangements on the Breakdown of Cohabitation: Influences and Disadvantage,” in Miles, J., & Probert, R., eds., Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Louis, Winnifred R., & Taylor, Donald M. (2005) “Rights and Duties as Group Norms: Implications of Intergroup Research for the Study of Rights and Responsibilities,” in Finkel, N.J., & Moghaddam, F.M., eds., The Psychology of Rights and Duties: Empirical Contributions and Normative Commentaries. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Mahar, Heather (2003) Why Are There So Few Prenuptial Agreements? Cambridge, MA: John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business. http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/436_mahar.php (accessed 31 March 2012).Google Scholar
Manning, Wendy D., & Smock, Pamela J. (2005) “Measuring and Modeling Cohabitation: New Perspectives from Qualitative Data,” 67 J. of Marriage and Family 989– 1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manting, Dorien (1996) “The Changing Meaning of Cohabitation and Marriage,” 12 European Sociological Rev. 53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, Joanna, Pleasence, Pascoe, & Balmer, Nigel J. (2009) “The Experience of Relationship Breakdown and Civil Law Problems by People in Different Forms of Relationship,” 21 Child and Family Law Q. 47–64.Google Scholar
Militello, Matthew, Schimmel, David, & Eberwein, H. Jake (2009) “If They Knew, They Would Change,” 93 NASSP Bulletin 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2011) Marriages in England and Wales 2009. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/marriages-in-england-and-wales–provisional-/2009/marriages-in-england-and-wales.pdf (accessed 31 March 2012).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2012) Marriages in England and Wales 2010. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/marriages-in-england-and-wales–provisional-/2010/index.html (accessed 31 March 2012).Google Scholar
Panades, Rosa, et al. (2007) Informing Unmarried Parents about Their Legal Rights at Birth registration. London: One Plus One.Google Scholar
Parle, Lewis (2009) Measuring Young People's Legal Capability. London: Public Legal Education Network.Google Scholar
PLEAS Task Force (2007) Developing Capable Citizens: The Role of Public Legal Education. London: Public Legal Education Task Force.Google Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe, Balmer, Nigel, Patel, Ash, Cleary, Andrew, Huskinson, Tom, & Cotton, Toby (2011) English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Panel Survey: Wave 1: Findings and Technical Report of the 2010 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Panel Survey. London: Legal Services Commission.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1907) “The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence,” 19 Green Bag 607–615.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca J. (2008) “Common-Law Marriage: Myths and Misunderstandings,” 20 Child and Family Law Q. 1–22.Google Scholar
Probert, Rebecca J. (2011) “The Evolution of the Common-Law Marriage Myth,” 41 Family Law 283–288.Google Scholar
Rasbash, Jon R., et al. (2009a) MLwiN Version 2.1. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Univ. of Bristol.Google Scholar
Rasbash, Jon R., et al. (2009b) A User's Guide to MLwiN, v2.10. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Univ. of Bristol.Google Scholar
Ross, Lee, Greene, David, & House, Pamela (1977) “The False Consensus Effect: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes,” 13 J. of Experimental Social Psychology 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, LaVell E. (1975) “Collective Ignorance: Public Knowledge of Family Law,” 24 The Family Coordinator 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, LaVell E. (1981) “Ignorance of the Law among Teenagers: Is It a Barrier to the Exertion of Their Rights as Citizens?,” 16 Adolescence 711–726.Google Scholar
Seber, George A.F., & Wild, Christopher J. (2003) Nonlinear Regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Shaw, Chris, & Haskey, John (1999) “New Estimates and Projections of the Population Cohabiting in England and Wales,” 95 Population Trends 7–17.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol, & Stevens, Pippa (2000) Cohabitation Breakdown. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
South, Scott J., & Spitze, Glenna (1994) “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households,” 59 American Sociological Rev. 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stake, Jeffrey E., & Grossberg, Michael (1998) “Roundtable: Opportunities for and Limitations of Private Ordering in Family Law,” 73 Indiana Law J. 535–565.Google Scholar
Stevens, W.L. (1951) “Asymptotic Regression,” 7 Biometrics 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasoff, Fran, & Martin, Claudia (2005) Scottish Social Attitudes Survey 2004 Family Module Report. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Wasoff, Fran, Miles, Joanna, & Mordaunt, Enid (2010) Legal Practitioners Perspectives on the Cohabitation Provisions of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006. Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Families and Relationships.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Neil D. (1980) “Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events,” 39 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore J. (1985) The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Martha, & Hall, Jay (1972) “Knowledge of the Law in Texas: Socioeconomic and Ethnic Differences,” 7 Law & Society Rev. 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Sean H. (2009) “Sticky Expectations: Responses to Persistent Over-Optimism in Marriage, Employment Contracts, and Credit Card Use,” 84 Notre Dame Law Rev. 733–791.Google Scholar