Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T06:51:45.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Poverty, Welfare, and the Affirmative State

Review products

Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Gilliom John, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
The Price of Citizenship: Redefining the American Welfare State. Katz Michael B., New York: Metropolitan Books, 2001.
Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History. O'Connor Alice, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Frank Munger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ethnographic study of American poverty from the Progressive Era to the present has provided a sympathetic window on the lives of the poor. Ethnographers bear witness to the world of need, oppression, and survival, but the best ethnography has always provided more than the stark facts of life in poverty. Carol Stack, Elliott Liebow, Joyce Ladner, and earlier generations of scholars helped us do more than put faces on the poor; their mission was to understand poverty in its social and institutional context—how the institutions of a democratic society create poverty and limit the capacity of the poor to participate fully in social life. Their scholarship grew first from a powerful moral and political principle: unless such institutions “work” for the poor as well as the better off, we cannot say that the poor have received an equal opportunity to become autonomous, successful participants in our society. Second, their scholarship exposes the myth of universal citizenship rights in the American welfare state, revealing such rights to be contingent upon identity.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 659 - 686
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Diller, Mathew (2000) “The Revolution in Welfare Administration: Rules, Discretion, and Entrepreneurial Government,” 75 New York University Law Rev. 1121–220.Google Scholar
Edin, Kathryn, & Lein, Laura (1997) Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan (1992) “Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness,” 26 New England Law Rev. 731–49.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha A. (1999) “Cracking the Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, and Self-Sufficiency,” 8 American University J. Gender and Social Policy 13–29.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1986) The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael (1984) “Bureaucratic Disentitlement in Social Welfare Programs,” 58 Social Services Rev. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1992) “Citizenship and Social Class,” in Marshall, T. H. & Bottomore, Tom, eds., Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha (1990) Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (2003) “Rights in the Shadow of Class: Poverty, Welfare, and the Law,” in Sarat, A., ed., The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles A. (1964) “The New Property,” 73 Yale Law J. 733–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, Sanford (2002) Praxis for the Poor: Piven and Cloward and the Future of Social Science in Welfare. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simon, William (1983) “Legality, Bureaucracy, and Class in the Welfare System,” 92 Yale Law J. 1198–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, William (1999) “Law After Society,” 24 Law & Social Inquiry 143–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stack, Carol (1976) All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
White, Lucie (1990) “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.,” 38 Buffalo Law Rev. 1–58.Google Scholar
White, Lucie (2002) “Care at Work,” in Munger, F., ed., Laboring Below the Line: The New Ethnography of Poverty, Low-Wage Work, and Survival in the Global Economy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Wyman v. James 400 U.S. 309 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar