Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:50:49.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Judging of War Criminals:Individual Responsibility and Jurisdiction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Extract

In a recent interview with a Dutch newspaper, Lord Owen, until the beginning of June Co-Chairman of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia, said:

[W]e were instructed by the conference to make recommendations on the establishment of a war crimes tribunal. We decided that this tribunal should be completely disconnected from the negotiating process. It should have a life of its own in order to enable us the negotiators for the UN and the EU to say that we had nothing to do with it in case the matter would be brought up to us.

Type
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. NRC/Handelsblad, 10 June 1995.

2. The Limits of UN Enforcement, Fourth Cornelis van Vollenhoven Memorial Lecture, 6 June 1995, Leiden University (not yet published) (emphasis added).

3. General Yamashiia case, 327 U.S. Supreme Court Reports 1, reproduced in 40 AJIL 432 (1946).

4. A.ĎAmato, Peace v. Accountability in Bosnia, 88 AJIL 500 (1994).

5. “The peace negotiators must have a realistic fear of being prosecuted if the war crimes tribunal is to become a credible bargaining chip”. Id., at 505.

6. Shraga, D. & Zacklin, R., The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 5 EJIL 361 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. UN Doc. S/RES/808 (1993) (emphasis added).