Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-pcn4s Total loading time: 0.402 Render date: 2022-05-23T06:29:12.837Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

ALTERNATIVE MONETARY POLICIES UNDER KEYNESIAN ANIMAL SPIRITS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Tai-kuang Ho
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
Ya-chi Lin
Affiliation:
Feng Chia University
Kuo-chun Yeh*
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
*
Address correspondence to: Kuo-chun Yeh, Graduate Institute of National Development, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan. e-mail: kuochunyeh@ntu.edu.tw. Phone: +886-2-33663334. Fax: +886-2-23676176.

Abstract

In this paper, we make the case that an argument for price-level targeting over inflation targeting need not to be based on some overly restrictive assumptions. We adopt a theoretical framework that deviates from the assumption of rational expectation, and that takes into account the cognitive limitations and a “trial and error” learning mechanism of the agents. The (im)perfect credibility of various monetary policies (e.g., a Taylor-type rule, strict domestic inflation targeting, strict consumer price index (CPI) inflation targeting, exchange rate peg, and domestic price-level and CPI-level targeting) may lead agents to react according to their expectation rules, and then create various degrees of booms and busts in output and inflation. Therefore, relaxing the rational expectation hypothesis has potential consequences for policy planning. We find that price-level targeting prevails over inflation targeting even under different expectation formation and even when the announced inflation target is not fully credible. The counterfactual analysis and sensitivity test confirm that CPI-level targeting is the most effective for improving social welfare and stability in an open economy. The business cycles induced by animal spirits are enhanced by strict inflation targeting.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank participants at the 3rd HenU/INFER Workshop on Applied Macroeconomics, the editors and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. Tai-kuang Ho: taikuangho@ntu.edu.tw. Ya-chi Lin: yaclin@fcu.edu.tw.

References

Akerlof, G. and Shiller, R. (2009) Animal Spirits. How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Akerlof, G. and Shiller, R. (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambler, S. (2009) Price-level targeting and stabilization policy: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 23(5), 974997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. and Engineer, M. (2001) When is price-level targeting a good idea? In: Bank of Canada, Price Stability and the Long-Run Target for Monetary Policy, pp. 101149.Google Scholar
Baxa, J., Horvath, R. and Vasicek, B. (2014) How does monetary policy change? Evidence on inflation-targeting countries. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18(3), 593630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belongia, M. T. and Ireland, P. N. (2014) A “working” solution to the question of nominal GDP targeting. Macroeconomic Dynamics 19(3), 508534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benati, L. (2011) Would the Bundesbank have prevented the great inflation in the United States? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35(7), 11061125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. and Jonung, L. (1999) Pioneering price-level targeting: The Swedish experience 1931-1937. Journal of Monetary Economics 43, 525551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, R. G. and de Boyer des Roches, J. (2013) Origins and developments of Irving Fisher’s compensated dollar plan. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20(2), 261283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billi, R. M. (2017) A note on nominal GDP targeting and the zero lower bound. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21(8), 21382157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2017) Federal Reserve issues FOMC statement. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20170315a.htm, accessed March 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Bordo, M. D., Dittmar, R. D. and Gavin, W. T. (2007) Gold, fiat money, and price stability. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 7(1), Article 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, W. A. and Evans, G. W. (2011) Monetary policy with heterogeneous expectations. Economic Theory 47, 365393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdekin, R. C. K., Mitchener, K. J. and Weidenmier, M. D. (2012) Irving Fisher and price-level targeting in Austria: Was silver the answer? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 44(4), 733750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, B. (2011) From the gold standard to price-level targeting: Swedish monetary policy in the daily press during the 1930s. Sveriges Riksbank Economic Review 1, 2964.Google Scholar
Constâncio, V. (2016) Challenges for future monetary policy frameworks: A European perspective. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2016/html/sp161104.en.html, accessed November 4, 2016.Google Scholar
Cornand, C. and M’baye, C. K. (2018) Does inflation targeting matter? An experimental investigation. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(2), 362401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grauwe, P. (2010) Top-down versus bottom-up macroeconomics. CESifo Economic Studies 56, 465497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grauwe, P. (2012) Lectures on Behavioral Macroeconomics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W. and Honkapohja, S. (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W. and McGough, B. (2018) Learning to optimize. https://www.lebow.drexel.edu/sites/default/files/event/1524679226-paper-bruce-mcgough-ii.pdf, accessed February 12, 2019.Google Scholar
Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M. and Roventini, A. (2008) Are output growth-rate distributions fat-tailed? Some evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23(5), 639669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhi, E. and Werning, I. (2017) Monetary Policy, Bounded Rationality, and Incomplete Markets. NBER Working Paper: No. 23281. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, I. (1913) A compensated dollar. Quarterly Journal of Economics 27(2), 213235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gattia, D. D., Di Guilmib, C., Gaffeoc, E., Giulionib, G., Gallegatib, M. and Palestrinib, A. (2005) A new approach to business fluctuations: Heterogenous interacting agents, scaling laws and financial fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 56(4), 489512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galí, J. (2015) Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycles: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Galí, J. and Monacelli, T. (2005) Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72(3), 707734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, M. and Minford, P. (2016) Stabilization policy, rational expectations and price-level versus inflation targeting: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys 30(2), 327355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahan, S. (2017) Inflation targeting: Holding the line, finance and development. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/target.htm, accessed August 19, 2017.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1923) A Tract on Monetary Reform. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Afrouzi, H., Coibion, O. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2015) Inflation targeting does not anchor inflation expectations: Evidence from firms in New Zealand. NBER Working Paper: No. 21814. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishkin, F. S. and Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2007) Does Inflation Targeting Make a Difference? NBER Working Paper: No. 12876. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patinkin, D. (1993) Irving Fisher and his compensated dollar plan. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 79(3), 134.Google Scholar
Pfajfar, D. and Zakelj, B. (2014) Experimental evidence on inflation expectation formation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 44, 147168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevensson, L. (2000) Open-economy inflation targeting. Journal of International Economics 50, 155183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, F. and Wouters, R. (2003) An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(5), 11231175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestin, D. (2006) Price-level versus inflation targeting. Journal of Monetary Economics 53(7), 13611376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickens, M. (2012) Macroeconomic Theory: A Dynamic General Equilibrium Approach. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C. (2014) Inflation targeting and the global financial crisis: Success and challenge. Speech 134, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C. (2016) Monetary policy in a low R-star world. FRBSF Economic Letter 23, 16.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2013) Macroeconomic analysis without the rational expectations hypothesis. NBER Working Paper: No. 19368. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Yeh, K. C. (2016) Monetary policy rules in an open economy with heuristics: Which model is best? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 52(9), 19701984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, K. C. (2017) Asset price targeting in an open economy with cognitive limitations: The best for macroeconomic and financial stability? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 39, 288299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ho et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Ho et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 361 KB

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

ALTERNATIVE MONETARY POLICIES UNDER KEYNESIAN ANIMAL SPIRITS
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

ALTERNATIVE MONETARY POLICIES UNDER KEYNESIAN ANIMAL SPIRITS
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

ALTERNATIVE MONETARY POLICIES UNDER KEYNESIAN ANIMAL SPIRITS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *