Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T08:51:30.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Developmental Reviewer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Paul S. Hempel*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorials on Reviewing
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

References

Carpenter, M. A. 2009. Mentoring colleagues in the craft and spirit of peer review. Academy of Management Review, 34(2): 191195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., & Ireland, R. D. 2009. Taking the mystery out of AMJ’s reviewer evaluation form. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 224228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 2003. Sense and sensibility: Balancing the interests of authors, reviewers, and editors. Journal of Management, 29(1): 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, D. C. 2008. Building and maintaining a strong editorial board and cadre of ad hoc reviewers. In Baruch, Y., Konrad, A. M., Aguinis, H. & Starbuck, W. H. (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship: 6874. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepak, D. 2009. What is good reviewing? Academy of Management Review, 34(3): 375381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, E. W. K., & Frey, B. S. 2007. The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1): 128136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Holleneck, J. R. 2009. Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational science. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2): 259275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar