Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation

  • Fei Song (a1), C. Bram Cadsby (a2) and Yunyun Bi (a3)

Abstract

We examine the influence of social distance on levels of trust and reciprocity in China. Social distance, reflected in the indigenous concept of guanxi, is of central importance to Chinese culture. In Study 1, some participants participated in two financially salient trust games to measure behaviour, one with an anonymous classmate and the other with an anonymous, demographically identical non-classmate. Other participants, drawn from the same population, completed hypothetical surveys to gauge both hypothetical behaviour and expectations of others. Social distance effects on actual and hypothetical behaviour were statistically consistent. The results together corroborated the hypothesized negative relationship between trust and social distance. However, reciprocity was not responsive to social distance. Study 2 found that affect-based trust, but not cognition-based trust, played a mediating role in the relationship between social distance and interpersonal trust in a hypothetical scenario. We conclude that close guanxi ties in China engender affect-based trust, which is extended to shouren classmates. This is true despite the fact that no more cognition-based trust is placed nor reciprocity received or expected from classmates compared to demographically identical shengren non-classmates.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Trust, Reciprocity, and Guanxi in China: An Experimental Investigation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Akerlof, G. A. 1997. Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65(5): 10051027.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 11731182.
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1): 122142.
Berry, J. W. 1994. An ecological perspective on cultural and ethnic psychology. In Trickett, E.J. Watts, R.J. & Birman, D. (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspective on people in context: 115141. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bian, Y. 1997. Bring strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3): 366385.
Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., & Ockenfels, A. 1998. Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in a simple dilemma game. Experimental Economics, 1(3): 207219.
Bond, M. H. 1991. Beyond the Chinese face: Insights from psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brislin, R. W. 1980. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In Triandis, H. C. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: 389444. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Buchan, N., & Croson, R. 2004. The boundaries of trust: Own and others' actions in the U.S. and China. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 55(4): 485504.
Buchan, N., Johnson, E. J., & Croson, R. 2006. Let's get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60(3): 373398.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butterfield, F. 1982. China: Alive in the bitter sea. New York: Times Books.
Camerer, C. F. 2003. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chai, S. K., & Rhee, M. 2010. Confucian capitalism and the paradox of closure and structural holes in East Asian firms. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 529.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3): 817869.
Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21 (3): 305324.
Chen, C.C., Chen, Y. R., & Xin, K. 2004. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organization Science, 15(2): 200209.
Chiao, C. 1982. Guanxi: A preliminary conceptualization. In Yang, K. S. & Wen, C. I. (Eds.), The sinicization of social and behavioral science research in China: 345360. Taipei: R.O.C.: Academia Sinica.
Child, J., & Mollering, G. 2003. Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment. Organization Science, 14(1): 6980.
Chua, R. Y. J., Morris, M. W., & Ingram, P. 2009. Guanxi vs. networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs. American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3): 490508.
Cox, J.C, & Deck, C. A. 2005. On the nature of reciprocal motives. Economic Inquiry, 43(3):623635.
Farh, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organizational Science, 9(4): 471488.
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Garbarino, E., & Slonim, R. 2009. The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous U.S. population. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 69(3): 226240.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481510.
Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. 2002. Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1):4966.
Guo, C, & Giacobbe-Miller, J. 2010. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 267291.
Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hogarth, R. M., & Reder, M. W. 1987. Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hwang, K. K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 944974.
Jacobs, J. B. 1979. A preliminary model of particularistic tics in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch'ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78: 237273.
King, A. Y. 1991. Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus, 120(2): 6384.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11): 14771490.
Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. 1995. Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In Bunker, B. B. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch, The Jossey-Bass management series and the Jossey-Bassy conflict resolution series: 122173. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bics, R. J. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities.Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 438458.
Li, S. X., Yao, X., Sue-Chan, C., & Xi, Y. 2011. Where do social ties come from: Institutional framework and governmental tie distribution among Chinese managers. Management and Organization Review, 7(1): 97124.
Loewenstein, G. 1996. Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3): 272292.
Luo, Y. D. 2000. Guanxi and business. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Mann, L., Radford, M., & Kanagawa, C. 1985. Cross-cultural difference in children's use of decision rules: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6): 15571564.
McAllister, D. J. 1995. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 2459.
Mayer, R. C, Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 709734.
Murnighan, J. K. 1994. Game theory and organizational behavior. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: 83123. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ng, K. Y., & Chua, R. Y. J. 2006. Do I contribute more when I trust more? Differential effects of cognition- and affect-based trust. Management and Organization Review, 2(1):4366.
Pillutla, M. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. 2003. Attributions of trust and the calculus of reciprocity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5): 448455.
Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. 1977. Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. In Roscnzweig, M. R. & Porter, L. W. (Eds.), Annual review of psychology: 363392. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Rabin, M. 2002. A perspective on psychology and economics. European Economic Review, 46(4–5): 657685.
Robinson, S. L 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 574599.
Rotter, J. B. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4): 651665.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393404.
Shweder, R. A. 1990. Cultural psychology: What is it? Stigler, J. W. Shweder, R. A. & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development: 146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, V. L. 1976. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review, 66(2): 274279.
Song, F. 2008. Trust and reciprocity: The differing norms of individuals and group representatives. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(2): 675696.
Song, F. 2009. The effect of the consensus-making process on intergroup trust and reciprocity in strategic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1): 164173.
Su, C, & Litdefield, J. E. 2001. Entering guanxi: A business ethical dilemma in mainland China? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3): 199210.
Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. 1997. Where Guanxi matters: Relational demography and guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1): 5679.
Van Boven, L., Dunning, D., & Loewenstein, G. 2000. Egocentric empathy gaps between owners and buyers: Misperceptions of the endowment effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1): 6676.
Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., & Erdil, S. E. 2011. Antecedents of trust across foci: A comparative study of Turkey and China. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 279302.
Webber, S. S., Chen, G., Marsh, S., & Payne, S. 1999. Performance appraisal research contributes to team mental model measurement. In Zaccaro, S.J. (Chair) & Hofmann, D. A. (Discussant), Breaking barriers in team research: New methodologies and applications for team research and practice. Symposium conducted at the 1998 annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Diego, CA.
Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. 2011. Trust and social exchange. In Druckman, J. N. Green, D. P. Kuklinski, J. H. & Lupia, A. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental political science. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Xin, K. R., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 16411658.
Yamagishi, T. 1998. The structure of trust: The evolutionary games of mind and society. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.
Yang, K. S. 2000. Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3):241263.
Yang, M. M. 1994. Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed