Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:09:57.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Construction of Smooth Parseval Frames of Shearlets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2013

K. Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Missouri State University, Springfield, Missouri 65804, USA
D. Labate*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: dlabate@math.uh.edu
Get access

Abstract

The shearlet representation has gained increasing recognition in recent years as a framework for the efficient representation of multidimensional data. This representation consists of a countable collection of functions defined at various locations, scales and orientations, where the orientations are obtained through the use of shear matrices. While shear matrices offer the advantage of preserving the integer lattice and being more appropriate than rotations for digital implementations, the drawback is that the action of the shear matrices is restricted to cone-shaped regions in the frequency domain. Hence, in the standard construction, a Parseval frame of shearlets is obtained by combining different systems of cone-based shearlets which are projected onto certain subspaces of L2(ℝD) with the consequence that the elements of the shearlet system corresponding to the boundary of the cone regions lose their good spatial localization property. In this paper, we present a new construction yielding smooth Parseval frame of shearlets for L2(ℝD). Specifically, all elements of the shearlet systems obtained from this construction are compactly supported and C in the frequency domain, hence ensuring that the system has also excellent spatial localization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Candès, E. J., Demanet, L.. The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 58 (2005), 14721528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candès, E. J., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., Ying, L.. Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms. Multiscale Model. Simul. 5 (2006), 861899. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candès, E. J., Donoho, D. L.. Ridgelets : the key to high dimensional intermittency?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 357 (1999), 24952509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candès, E. J., Donoho, D. L.. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with C2 singularities. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57 (2004), 219266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonna, F., Easley, G., Guo, K., Labate, D.. Radon Transform Inversion using the Shearlet Representation. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 29 (2) (2010), 232250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlke, S., Kutyniok, G., Maass, P., Sagiv, C., Stark, H.-G., Teschke, G.. The uncertainty principle associated with the continuous shearlet transform. Int. J. Wavelets Multiresolut. Inf. Process. 6 (2008), 157181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Do, M. N., Vetterli, M.. The contourlet transform : an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14 (2005), 20912106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoho, D. L.. Wedgelets : Nearly-minimax estimation of edges. Annals of Statistics, 27 (1999), 859897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, G. R., Labate, D., Colonna, F.. Shearlet-Based Total Variation Diffusion for Denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Proc. 18 (2) (2009), 260268. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easley, G. R., Labate, D., Lim, W.. Sparse Directional Image Representations using the Discrete Shearlet Transform. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 25 (1) (2008), 2546. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohs, P.. Tree Approximation with anisotropic decompositions. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 33(1) (2012), 4457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Grohs. Bandlimited Shearlet Frames with nice Duals. SAM Report 2011-55, ETH Zurich, July 2011.
K. Guo, G. Kutyniok, D. Labate. Sparse Multidimensional Representations using Anisotropic Dilation and Shear Operators in : Wavelets and Splines, G. Chen and M. Lai (eds.), Nashboro Press, Nashville, TN (2006), pp. 189–201.
Guo, K., Labate, D.. Optimally Sparse Multidimensional Representation using Shearlets. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (2007), 298318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D.. Representation of Fourier Integral Operators using Shearlets. J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 14 (2008), 327371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D.. Characterization and analysis of edges using the continuous shearlet transform. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 2 (2009), 959986. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D.. Optimally sparse 3D approximations using shearlet representations. Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 17 (2010), 126138. Google Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D.. Optimally sparse representations of 3D Data with C2 surface singularities using Parseval frames of shearlets. SIAM J Math. Anal. 44 (2012), 851886. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D., Lim, W.-Q.. Edge analysis and identification using the Continuous Shearlet Transform. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 27 (2009), 2446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, K., Labate, D., Lim, W.-Q, Weiss, G., Wilson, E.. Wavelets with composite dilations. Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (2004), 7887. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K. Guo, D. Labate, W-Q. Lim, G. Weiss, E. Wilson. The theory of wavelets with composite dilations. in : Harmonic Analysis and Applications, C. Heil (ed.), Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 2006.
Guo, K., Lim, W-Q., Labate, D., Weiss, G., Wilson, E.. Wavelets with composite dilations and their MRA properties. Appl. Computat. Harmon. Anal. 20 (2006), 231249. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, B.. Pairs of frequency-based nonhomogeneous dual wavelet frames in the distribution space. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 29 (2010), 330353. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, B.. Nonhomogeneous wavelet systems in high dimensions. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 32 (2012), 169196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houska, R.. The nonexistence of shearlet scaling functions. Appl. Comput Harmon. Anal. 32 (1) (2012), 2844. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
P. Kittipoom, G. Kutyniok, W.-Q Lim. Construction of compactly supported shearlet frames. Constr. Approx., to appear (2012).
G. Kutyniok. Sparsity Equivalence of Anisotropic Decompositions. preprint (2012).
Kutyniok, G., Labate, D.. Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), 27192754. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutyniok, G., Lim, W.-Q.. Compactly supported shearlets are optimally sparse. J. Approx. Theory 163 (2011), 15641589. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutyniok, G., Sauer, T.. Adaptive Directional Subdivision Schemes and Shearlet Multiresolution Analysis. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009), 14361471. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. Labate, W.-Q Lim, G. Kutyniok, G. Weiss. Sparse multidimensional representation using shearlets. in Wavelets XI, edited by M. Papadakis, A. F. Laine, and M. A. Unser, SPIE Proc. 5914 (2005), SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005, 254–262.
Y. Meyer, R. Coifman. Wavelets, Calderón-Zygmund Operators and Multilinear Operators. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997.
Negi, P. S., Labate, D.. 3D Discrete Shearlet Transform and Video Processing. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21 (6) (2012), 29442954. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, V.M., Easley, G., Healy, D. M.. Shearlet-based deconvolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18 (12) (2009), 2673-2685 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yi, S., Labate, D., Easley, G. R., Krim, H.. A Shearlet approach to Edge Analysis and Detection. IEEE Trans. Image Process 18 (5) (2009), 929941. Google ScholarPubMed