Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T14:59:04.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some statistical properties of random noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. K. C. MacDonald
D. K. C. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Clarendon LaboratoryOxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A considerable volume of knowledge is now available on random fluctuations (noise) as regards the behaviour in amplitude. Familiar names in this field are those of Uhlenbeck and Ornstein(7), Fürth(1) and Rice (4), although very many others have made valuable contributions. A particular class of problem, of considerable practical importance, exists when the frequency spectrum is limited to a relatively narrow range. The resulting noise has then the character of a more or less regular oscillation modulated randomly in amplitude and phase. In this case, if we write the fluctuation in the form

(where R(t) and θ(t) are variables changing slowly in comparison with sinω0t), it is clear that the magnitude of the envelope R(t) and the phase θ(t) are now the significant quantities. Rice (4), among others, has made a study of the statistical properties of R, deriving in particular the correlation function R(t) R(t + τ) in terms of the characteristics of the (power) spectrum ω(f). Fürth and the writer (2) have extended this work and carried out a collateral experimental investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 1949 , pp. 368 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Fürth, R. Z. Phys. 2 (1920), 244; Phys. Z. 23 (1922), 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Fürth, R. and MacDonald, D. K. C.Proc. Phys. Soc. 59 (1947), 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Ratcliffe, J. A. and Pawsey, J. L.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 29 (1933), 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawsey, J. L.Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 31 (1935), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliffe, J. A.Nature, London, 162 (1948), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Rice, S. O.Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 23 (1944), 282; 24 (1945), 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Rice, S. O.Bell. Syst. Tech. J. 27 (1948), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Stumpers, F. L. H. M.Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs, N.Y., 36 (1948), 1081.Google Scholar
(7)Uhlenbeck, G. E. and Ornstein, L. S.Phys. Rev. 36 (1930), 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, L. S., Burger, H. C. et al. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 115 (1927), 391.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, G. E. and Wang, M. C.Rev. Mod. Phys. 17 (1945), 326.Google Scholar
(8)Watson, G. N.A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions (Cambridge, 1944, 2nd ed.), p. 388.Google Scholar