Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:42:18.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Evaluation of Dating of Diagenetic Xenotime by Electron Microprobe.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Brendan J. Griffin
Affiliation:
Western Australian Centre for Microscopy, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA6907
Duncan Forbes
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA6907
Neal J. McNaughton
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA6907
Get access

Extract

Xenotime is an igneous mineral commonly present in pegmatite and fractionated granite. Recent studies reveal that it also forms as a diagenetic mineral. Minute (0.1-5 μm) xenotime overgrowths typically crystallise on the surfaces of detrital zircon shortly after sedimentation, in a wide range of siliciclastic sedimentary units. For example, in backscattered electron (BSE) imaging using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), two minute, euhedral, pyramidal, xenotime overgrowths on an oscillatory-zoned detrital Ambergate zircon are evident (figure 1).

Electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) geochronology is a chemical dating method that uses precisely measured concentrations of U, Th, and Pb, and the decay rates of U238, U235, and Th232, to calculate an age for a mineral. The EMPA dating method used in this study to date igneous xenotime and igneous-metamorphic monazite is the chemical isochron method (CHIME). EMPA geochronology is not a widely used technique because of the higher precision of isotopic geochronology.

Type
Ceramics & Minerals
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.B., Rasmussen, (1996). Amer. J. Sci, 296: 601632.Google Scholar
2.Suzuki, K., & Adachi, M., (1991). Geochem. J., 25: 357376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. This project was funded by the Australian Research Council and the University of Western Australia.Google Scholar