Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T13:06:49.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coherent of PbTe/MgO Bi-Crystals and its Multislice Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

N. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-01, Japan
M. Egi
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, 464-01, Japan
K. Kimoto
Affiliation:
Hitachi Laboratory, Hitachi Co., Hitachi, 319-12, Japan
Get access

Extract

Atomic structure of hetero-interfaces such as semiconductor/oxide is recently much interested from the viewpoints of the device engineering as well as the interface science. Studies of the interface structures have been performed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)[1], large-angle convergent beam electron diffraction[2] in the cross-sectional observation mode, and by X-ray diffraction[3], TEM[4] and CBED[5] in the plan-view mode. In the present study we applied a coherent convergent beam electron diffraction (c-CBED) technique to the analysis of the rigid-body shift between vacuum-deposited PbTe and MgO (001) thin crystals in the plan-view mode. The c-CBED technique was originated in nano-diffraction experiments by Cowley[6] and the theoretical analysis by Spence[7]. These results suggested a possibility of direct structure-phase determination from the interference fringes formed at coherent overlaps between the diffraction disks. This technique has been recently revived using TEM on SiC by Vine et al.[8] The present study is the first to be concerned with the analysis of interference fringes in c-CBED patterns from epitaxially grown bi-crystals[9].

Type
Electron Crystallography; the Electron Phase Problem
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Cherns, D., Antis, G.R., Hutchison, J.L. and Spence, J.C.H.: Philo. Mag.,A46(1982), 849.10.1080/01418618208236936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Humphreys, C.J., Maher, D.M., Fraser, H.L. and Eaglesham, D.J.: Philo. Mag., A58(1988), 787.10.1080/01418618808209953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Akimoto, K., Ishikawa, T., Takahashi, T. and Kikuta, S.: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 24 (1985), 1425.10.1143/JJAP.24.1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Honjo, G. and Yagi, K.: in Current Topics in Materials Science (North-Holland, 1980), 6, Ch.6.Google Scholar
[5]Eaglesham, D.J., Kiely, C.J. and Cherns, D.: Philo. Mag., A60(1989), 161.10.1080/01418618908219279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cowley, J.M.: Ultramicrosc., 4 (1979), 435.10.1016/S0304-3991(79)80021-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Spence, J.C.H.: Scanning Electron Microscopy, 1(1978), 61.Google Scholar
[8]Vine, W.J., Vincent, R., Spellward, P. and Steeds, J.W.: Ultramicrosc., 41(1992), 423.10.1016/0304-3991(92)90222-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Tanaka, N., Egi, M. and Kimoto, K.: J. Interface Sci., (1997), in print.Google Scholar
[10]Pan, M., Cowley, J.M. and Barry, J.C.: Ultramicrosc., 30(1989), 385.10.1016/0304-3991(89)90069-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar