Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T17:37:36.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Scan Rate and Electron Dose on the Secondary Electron Contrast of Liquids in Environmental SEM (ESEM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D.J. Stokes
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids, Dept. of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge., U.K.CB3 0HE.
B.L. Thiel
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids, Dept. of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge., U.K.CB3 0HE.
A.M. Donald
Affiliation:
Polymers & Colloids, Dept. of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge., U.K.CB3 0HE.
Get access

Extract

We report the effects of scan rate/electron dose on the secondary electron contrast in liquid systems, studied by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM). Understanding the mechanisms for SE contrast is essential: previous observations of oil-water emulsions have revealed useful SE contrast between the dispersed and continuous phases, attributed to differences in the electronic structure of these molecular liquids. However, it has been found that large oil droplets for example, have a propensity to give SE contrast that can be inverted (relative to the continuous water phase) as a function of scan rate/electron dose, as shown in Figures 1 & 2. In the ‘grabbed’ image, Figure 1, the scan rate is a relatively rapid 2.1 frames/sec. and results in the expected image of oil droplets with lower SE signal intensity than the surrounding water phase. However, the intensity of the oil droplets changes dramatically when the scan rate is slowed, such that the droplets appear bright. Figure 2 shows the same region of sample as in Figure 1, but with image acquisition over 30 seconds. The same contrast inversion can occur at rapid scan rate if higher magnification is used. Effects such as this could result in ambiguous interpretation of ESEM images. However, useful information may be gathered as to the dielectric nature of the medium — a property related to molecular structure. We note that similar scan rate-dependent effects have been observed in ESEM studies of solid samples, although the mechanisms responsible have yet to be rigorously established.

Type
Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy and Other Wet Work
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Stokes, D.J., Thiel, B.L. and Donald, A.M.. Langmuir, 1998. 14(16): p. 44024408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Doehne, E.Microscopy & Microanalysis, 1998. 4(Suppl.2: Proceedings): p. 292293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Griffin, B.J.Microscopy & Microanalysis, 1997. 3(Supplement 2: Proceedings): p. 11971198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Farley, A. and Shah, J., High-Pressure Scanning Electron Microscopy of Insulating Materials: A New Approach. J. Microscopy, 1991. 164(Pt. 2): p. 107126.Google Scholar
5.Tabor, D., in Gases, Liquids and Solids, and Other States of Matter. 1991: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lewis, T.J. in The Liquid State and its Electrical Properties, Kunhardt, E.E., Christorophou, L.G., and Luessen, L.H., Editors. 1988, Plenum Press, p. 434436.Google Scholar
7.Ganachaud, J. and Mokrani, A.. Surface Science, 1995. 334: p. 329-241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Blaise, G. and Le Gressus, C.. J. Applied Physics, 1991. 69(9): p. 63346339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. This research is funded by the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK, and Du Pont (UK) Ltd, Cereals Innovation Centre, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar