Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T23:07:56.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Voltage Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy Provides Structural Evidence For Actin-Sized Filaments In Toxoplasma Gondii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Heide Schatten
Affiliation:
Dept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO65211
David Sibley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO65211
Hans Ris
Affiliation:
Dept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO65211
Get access

Extract

The protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondiiis an obligate intracellular parasite that exhibits gliding and twisting motility during cell locomotion and host cell invasion. By using molecular and genetic approaches it has been determined that actin and myosin are localized beneath the parasite plasma membrane and produce the force for motility and active penetration during host cell invasion. However, structural evidence for actin fibers beneath the plasma membrane is still missing. Recently Chavez et al. demonstrated actin-like filaments in isolated cytoskeletal complexes. Our aproach has been to remove the cell membrane with 0.15% Triton X-100 in cytoskeleton preserving buffer, followed by imaging with low voltage field emission SEM. As seen in Fig. I, we could demonstrate the subpellicle actin network in parasites invading a host cell (arrow). Fig. 2 shows a similar subsurface network of actin filaments in a parasite gliding on glass.

Type
Microbiology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dobrowolski, J.J., et al., Cell Motil. Cytoskel. (1997) 37, 253262.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Chávez, S., et al., Electron Microscopy ICEM1 4 (1998), p. 263264.Google Scholar
3.Schliwa, M.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (1981) 78, 43234333.Google Scholar
4.Ris, H., In: Proc. Xllth Intl. Congress Electron Microscopy (1990), p. 1819.Google Scholar
5.Ris, H., and Malecki, M., J. Struct. Biol. 11, 148157.Google Scholar
6.Aikawa, M., et al., Am. J. of Pathology (1977) 87, 285296.Google Scholar
7.Morrissette, N.S., et al., J. Cell Sci. (1997) 110, 3542.Google Scholar