Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T19:31:28.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimum Window Size for Quantitating Trace Elements Using Linear Least Squares Fit With Eels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Ruoya Ho
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Physiology & Biological Physics, HSC, University of Virginia, Box 449, Charlottesville, VA22908
Jiang Lin Feng
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Physiology & Biological Physics, HSC, University of Virginia, Box 449, Charlottesville, VA22908
Zhifeng Shao
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Physiology & Biological Physics, HSC, University of Virginia, Box 449, Charlottesville, VA22908 Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA22903
Andrew P. Somlyo
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Physiology & Biological Physics, HSC, University of Virginia, Box 449, Charlottesville, VA22908
Get access

Extract

Trace element quantitation with EELS is a powerful tool for providing information about elemental distribution in biological and materials sciences. Linear least squares fit (LSF) to standards of the signal and the background is a widely used method for retrieving small signals superimposed on a large, slowly varying background. Theoretically, for most accurate background fitting, the fitting window should be as large as possible. However, when using a large window, there may be a mismatch between the fine structure of the standard and the measured background, due to instability of the instrument and the experimental conditions and radiation damage. This mismatch, distributed over the entire window, can severely affect the accuracy of the small signal extracted with LSF. To overcome this problem, a small window, slightly larger than the signal is often used. Fig. 1 shows the results of extracting a small Ca signal by using respectively, a large and a small window for fitting an EELS spectrum collected from a specimen containing 26.3 mmol/kg dry weight Ca.

Type
Computational Methods for Microscopy and Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wang, Y.Y., et al., Ultramicroscopy, 41 (1992) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shuman, H. and Somlyo, A.P, Ultramicroscopy, 21 (1987) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Leapman, R.D. et al., Ultramicroscopy, 49 (1993) 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Press et al., Numerical recipes, Cambridge University Press, (1986).Google Scholar
5. This work is supported by NIH grant P01-HL48807.Google Scholar