Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:28:49.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Study of Structural Disorder in Spinel by ALCHEMI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

I.M. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Metals & Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN37831
Get access

Abstract

The mineral spinel (MgAl2O4) is a candidate material for proposed fusion reactors because of its resistance to structural damage during irradiation. When irradiated to high damage levels, spinel is eventually driven amorphous. However, at lower fluences the nearly cubic close packed arrangement of the oxygen anions remains intact, as indicated by electron diffraction patterns consistent with a face centered cubic Bravais lattice. in this regime, the damage to the material is manifested primarily in the redistribution of the magnesium and aluminum cations among the interstices of the anion sublattice. For ion irradiation, the study of these early stages of damage is well suited to electron beam characterization methods, because the damage is spatially localized at the nearsurface region. Electron diffraction methods have been used for the characterization of cation disorder, but are notoriously unreliable because the similarity in the elastic scattering cross sections offers little discrimination between the magnesium and aluminum cations.

Type
Atom Location by Channeling Enhancement of X-Ray and EELS Signals (ALCHEMI)(organized by J.Spence)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Devanathan, R., Sickafus, K.E., Yu, N., and Nastasi, M., Philos. Mag. Lett. 72(1995)155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Zinkle, S.J., Matzke, H. and Skuratov, V.A., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 540(1999)299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Ishimaru, M., Afanasyev-Charkin, I.V. and Sickafus, K.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76(2000)2556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Spence, J.C.H. and Taft∅, J., J. Microsc. 130(1983)147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Taft∅, J. and Liliental, Z., J . Appl. Cryst. 15(1982)260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Spence, J.C.H., Graham, R.J. and Shindo, D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 62(1986)153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Self, P.G. and Buseck, P.R., Phil. Mag. A 48(1983)L21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Qian, W., Tötdal, B., Hoier, R. and Spence, J.C.H., Ultramicrosc. 41(1992)147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Anderson, I.M., Microscopy & Microanalysis 5 [Suppl.2: Proceedings] (1999)786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Zaluzec, N.J., Microscopy & Microanalysis 6 [Suppl.2: Proceedings] (2000)938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Allen, L.J., Josefsson, T.W. and Rossouw, C.J., Ultramicrosc. 55(1994)258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. Research at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory SHaRE User Facility was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with UT-Battelle, LLC.Google Scholar