Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T13:57:26.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Triggered Morphology Generation in a Biosynthetic Model Spider Dragline Silk Protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

R. Valluzzi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA02155
S. Szela
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA02155
D. Kirschner
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Boston College, Allston, MA02467
D. Kaplan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology Center, Tufts University, Medford, MA02155
Get access

Extract

Recombinant DNA techniques were used to prepare a protein modeled after the consensus sequence of Nephila clavipesspider dragline silk, incorporating methionine residues to serve as redox “triggers”. In addition a water-soluble 27 residue peptide model of the dragline silk consensus amorphous sequence, representing a single amorphous block in the protein sequence, was prepared and characterized to gain additional insight into the behavior of the amorphous phase. X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to characterize the ability of the recombinant protein to form (β-sheet crystals and the effect of the oxidation state of the redox trigger on crystallinity and noncrystalline order in the sample. The formation of intractable β-sheet crystallites is a major cause of insolubility in proteins that can form this type of secondary structure. Changes in crystallinity were observed when triggered/reduced (insoluble) and untriggered/oxidized (soluble) protein samples were compared.

Type
Biopolymers and Biomemetics
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

l)Winkler, S.; Szela, S.; Avtges, P.; Valluzzi, R.; Kerschner, D.; Kaplan, D. L.Int. J. Biol. Mol. 1998Google Scholar
2)Candelas, G. C; Cintron, J.Journal of Experimental Zoology 1981, 216, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3)Mello, C.Senecal, M., Yeung, K., Vouros, B., Kaplan, P., D. Initial Characterization of Nephilia clavipes Dragline Protein, Kaplan, D., FarmerW. W. A., B. W. W. A., B., Viney, C., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington D. C, 1994; Vol. 544, pp 67.Google Scholar
4)Yeung, B; Vouros, P.; Mello, C. M.; Kaplan, D. L. In Review 1997.Google Scholar
5)We would like to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation; NSF DMR- 9708062 and NSF BES-9727401, the NSF MRSEC program, and from the W. M. Keck Foundation Biomimetic Materials and Polymer Morphology LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar