Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T09:34:12.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ultrastructure of Conidia of the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Entomosporium Mespili

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Elizabeth A. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, GA30602, USA
Charles W. Mims
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA30602, USA
Get access

Extract

Entomosporium mespili has emerged as a significant pathogen of red tip (Photinia × fraseri), a popular and widely grown ornamental in the southeastern United States. This fungal pathogen produces its distinctive multi-celled, insect-like asexual spores or conidia (Fig. 1) in structures known as acervuli (Fig. 2) that rupture the surfaces of infected leaves. This study examines the fine structure of these conidia using a combination of scanning and transmission electron microscopy. In the case of transmission electron microscopy, conidia were prepared for study using either plunge freezing or high pressure freezing followed by freeze substitution.

Each mature conidium of E. mespili consists of four to six cells (Fig. 1). These include one apical cell and one basal cell and two to four small lateral cells attached to the basal cell. The apical and lateral cells each possess a long, slender appendage. Excluding these appendages, the length of a mature conidium is usually 20-24μm while the diameters of the apical and basal cells are 8-11μm and 6-9μm respectively.

Type
Light and Electron Microscopic Techniques for the Study of Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Their Interactions with Host Plants
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Baudoin, A. B. A. M., Plant Disease (1986)70, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Enkerli, K. et al., Canadian Journal of Botany (1997)75, 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hoch, H. C., in Ultrastructure Techniques for Microorganisms, Eds. Aldrich, H. C. and Todd, W. J, New York: Plenum (1986)183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar