Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T03:01:34.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pros and Cons of Low Voltage SEM EDX Elemental Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Ed Boyes*
Affiliation:
DuPont Company

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It was Castaing who many years ago lamented “First 1 realized that in massive samples which concerned the metallurgists i would have to give up the splendid resolving power that I had cheerfully envisaged, as 1 became aware of the terrific path that my electrons would perform haphazardly in the sample before agreeing to stop. I had to limit my ambitions to analyzing volumes of a few cubic micrometers. This was a big disappointment. ..”. In the early days most instruments for imaging and microanalysis of bulk samples were restricted to operating only at relatively high beam energies (∼30kV) and for many (and perhaps too many) years this became the accepted operating procedure. However, we now know there are substantial advantages (pros) in using lower, and in some cases much lower, voltages; but also some significant limitations (cons). So what is possible?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2003

References

1. Gastaing, R (1991), in Electron Probe Quantitation, Eds K F J Heinrich and D E Newbury, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
2. Bethe, H (1933), Hdbk of Physics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and NY Google Scholar
3. Boyes, E D (2001), Microscopy and Microanalysis, 6, 307 Google Scholar
4. Echlin, P (2001), Microscopy and Microanalysis, 7, 211 Google Scholar
5. Boyes, E D (1998), Adv Materials, 10, 1277 Google Scholar
6. Cliff, G, Larimer, G W (1975), Journal of Microscopy, 103, 203 Google Scholar
7. FBastinand, G Heijlgers, H J M (1991), ibid ref 1.Google Scholar
8. Agnello, R, etal. (1997), Proc Microscopy and Micronalysis, 55, 889 Google Scholar
9. Irwin, K D, Wollman, D A (1996), Appl Phys Letts, 69. 1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Boyes, E D (2002), Mikrochimica Aota, 138, 225 Google Scholar