Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:36:48.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulphide mineralogy of the Tomnadashan copper deposit and the Corrie Buie lead veins, south Loch Tayside, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. A. D. Pattrick*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL

Abstract

Copper mineralization at Tomnadashan is associated with granitic lenses intruded into a small Caledonian diorite body. The mineralization occurs as disseminations and irregular veinlets and mainly comprises pyrite, chalcopyrite, tetrahedrite-tennantite, calcite, and quartz. There are small inclusions of bismuthinite, galena, aikinite [(Cu,Pb,Fe,Bi)S3], and a mineral with a chemistry similar to hodrushite (Cu8Bi12S22). The tetrahedrite contains up to 6.1 wt. % bismuth.

Four km to the south, at Corrie Buie, are quartz veins, hosted by meta-limestones, containing galena with minor amounts of chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, electrum, schirmerite, and lillianite homologues.

The mineralogy of both deposits is consistent with that associated with acid magmatism. There are mineralogical similarities between the two deposits but the style of mineralization at Tomnadashan suggests a limited hydrothermal system and therefore the Corrie Buie veins may be related to felsic intrusives to the south.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohmer, H. (1964) Geol. Soc. Am. Special Paper 82.Google Scholar
Boldyreva, M. M., and Borodayer, Yu. S. (1973) Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. R12, 5.Google Scholar
Buhlman, E. (1971) News Jahrb. Mineral. Mh. 137–41.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. W. (1979) In The Geochemistry of Hydrothermal Ore Deposits, 2nd edn. (Barnes, H. L., ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, 71136.Google Scholar
Charlat, M., and Levy, C. (1974) Bull. Soc. fr. Mineral. Crystallogr. 97, 241–50.Google Scholar
Czamanske, G. K., and Hall, W. E. (1975) Econ. Geol. 70, 1092–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiss, P. G. (1974) Ibid. 69, 383–90.Google Scholar
Fortey, N. J. (1980) Trans. Inst. Mining Metall. B, 80, B173–6.Google Scholar
Gill, J. (1981) Orogenic Andesites and Plate Tectonics. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, L. B. (1961) Loch Tay Copper. Geologist's report.Google Scholar
Harmon, R. S., and Halliday, A. N. (1980) Nature. 283, 21–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. C., and Chen, T. T. (1976) Can. Mineral. 14, 194205.Google Scholar
Kodera, M., Kupcik, V., and Makovicky, E. (1970) Mineral. Mag. 37, 641–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupcik, V., and Makovicky, E. (1968) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Mh. 236–7.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E., and Karup-Møller, S. (1977a) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 131, 187207.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1977b) Ibid. 5682.Google Scholar
Oen, I. S., and Kiefe, C. (1976) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Mh. 94–6.Google Scholar
Pattrick, R. A. D. (1981) Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Strathclyde (unpubl.).Google Scholar
Plant, J., Brown, G. C., Simpson, P. R., and Smith, R. T. (1980) Trans. Inst. Mining Metall B, 89, B198210.Google Scholar
Philips, W. E. A., Stillman, C. J., and Murphy, T. (1976) J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 132, 579609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, C. J., and Vaughan, D. J. (1982) Ibid. 569, 79.Google Scholar
Sugaki, A., and Shima, H. (1978) Experimental Petrology IV, Recent Progress of Natural Sciences in Japan. 3, 267–78.Google Scholar
Thost, C. H. G. (1860) Proc. Geol. Soc. 421–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. S. G., and Cadell, M. (1884) R. Phys. Soc. Edinb. 8, 189–207.Google Scholar
Zabala, C. M. (1970) M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Strathclyde (unpubl.).Google Scholar