Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:05:00.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Lazy’ Natives, Coolie Labour, and the Assam Tea Industry*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

JAYEETA SHARMA
JAYEETA SHARMA*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaM1C 1A4 Email: sharma@utsc.utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the creation of a ‘coolie’ work-force for the Assam tea industry and the local dimensions of tea plantation enterprise. While the industry has flourished through its use of migrant labour and export markets for tea, it has retained important connections with the locality. The Assam tea industry was a predominantly colonial enterprise manned by white British planters. It allowed participation, albeit in subordinate and dependent roles, by local peasants and gentry, though mainly based on the labour of migrant ‘coolies’ recruited on indentured contracts. The prominence of ‘imported’ coolie workers has obscured the significance of various local groups as well as the tea industry's importance in the local ‘imagination’. Despite the gradual development of nationalist antagonism towards the white ‘Planters' Raj’, tea enterprise retained a hallowed place for the Assamese middle classes, as tea workers continued as a racialized labouring class.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 1287 - 1324
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sources

Assam: Sketch of its History, Soil and Productions, with the Discovery of the Tea-Plant, and of the Countries Adjoining Assam, 1839. London.Google Scholar
Assam Labour Enquiry Committee Report of 1906. Calcutta, 1906.Google Scholar
Alatas, S. 1977. The Myth of the Lazy Native. London.Google Scholar
Allen, B.C. 1902. Census of India, 1901: Volume 4: Assam: Part 1, Report. Shillong.Google Scholar
Allen, B.C. 1906. Assam District Gazetteers. Sibsagar, Allahabad.Google Scholar
Antrobus, H.A. 1957. A History of Assam Company, 1839–1953. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2004. ‘Race, Place and Bodily Difference in Early Nineteenth Century India’, Historical Research, May, pp. 254–73.Google Scholar
Assam Administrative Report, 1882–3. Shillong, 1884.Google Scholar
Assam State Archives. 1861. Letters to Indian Government, Vol. 24, No 80/20, November.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, T. 2002. Orientalism and Race. Hampshire.Google Scholar
Bamber, E.F. 1866. An Account of the Cultivation and Manufacture of Tea in India from Personal Observation, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Barker, G. 1884. A Tea Planter's Life in Assam. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Barua, P. 1963. Assamese Proverbs. Guwahati.Google Scholar
Barua, G. 1873. Assam Buranji. Calcutta, p. 169.Google Scholar
Barua, P.G. 1899. Assam Buranji. Tezpur.Google Scholar
Bezbarua, L. 1887. ‘Kuli’ (The Coolie). In: Mau or The Bee.Google Scholar
Bora, B. 1887. ‘Sah Bagisar Kuli’ (The Tea Garden Coolie). In: Bora, H. (ed.), Mau or The Bee, February, Calcutta.Google Scholar
Bordoloi, H., Goswami, P. & Mahanta, M. (eds.). 1991. Shramikpran Sarbeswar Bordoloi (Labour Leader Sarbeswar Bordoloi). Jorhat.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1837, Report from the Select Committee on Aborigines (British Settlements). Volume 425, Paper 7.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1839. ‘The Tea of Assam. Vol. XXXIX, Paper 63.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1839. Papers Relating to Measures for Introducing Cultivation of Tea Plant in British Possessions in India, Vol. XXXIX, Paper 63.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1839. Report on the Tea Plant of Upper Assam. India Revenue Consultations, 20 June, 1836. Vol. XXXIX, Paper 63.Google Scholar
British Parliamentary Papers, 1839. Extract Indian Revenue Consultations, 11 July, 1836, Vol. XXXIX, Paper 63.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1847. A Sketch of Assam. London, p. 35.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1855. Travels and Adventures in the Province of Assam. London.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. 1865. ‘The Ethnology of India,’ Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Supplementary Number, Volume 30, Part 2.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, R. 1988. ‘Land Grant as a Method of Labour Control in Assam Plantations in Colonial Times’, Proceedings: Indian History Congress, pp. 520–23.Google Scholar
Chang, Chen-Tung. 1988. ‘Chinese Coolie Trade in the Straits Settlements in [the] late Nineteenth Century’, Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Spring 65: 1–29.Google Scholar
Coke, Burnell A. & Yule, H. (eds.). 1883. Hobson-Jobson: A Glossary of Colloquial Anglo-Indian Words and Phrases. London.Google Scholar
Cotton, H.J. 1911. Indian and Home Memories. London.Google Scholar
Crawfurd, J. 1971. In: Chaudhuri, K.N., The Economic Development of India, 1814–1858. Cambridge, pp. 250–251.Google Scholar
Crole, D. 1897. A Textbook of Tea Planting and Manufacture. London.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. 1992. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York.Google Scholar
Das Gupta, R. 1992. ‘Plantation Labour in Colonial India’. In: Daniel, E.V., Bernstein, H. & Brass, T. (eds.), Plantations, Proletarians and Peasants in Colonial Asia, London, pp. 180–181.Google Scholar
Deas, F.T.R. 1886. The Young Tea-Planter's Companion: A Practical Treatise on the Management of a Tea-garden in Assam. London.Google Scholar
Dutta, A.K. 1990. The Khongiya Baruahs of Thengal. Guwahati.Google Scholar
Endle, S. 1911. The Kacharis. London.Google Scholar
Fuller, B.J. 1930. Some Personal Experiences. London.Google Scholar
Ganguli, D. 1886–7. Slavery in British Dominion. In the Bengalee. Reprinted, Calcutta, 1972.Google Scholar
Gardella, R. 1994. Harvesting Mountains. Fujian and the China Tea Trade, 1757–1937. Berkeley.Google Scholar
General Reports on Public Instruction in Assam. 1876–79. Shillong, p. 5.Google Scholar
Ghosh, K. 1999. ‘A Market for Aboriginality: Primitivism and Race Classification in the Indentured Labour Market of Colonial India’. In: Bhadra, G., Prakash, G. & Tharu, S. (eds.), Subaltern Studies, Volume 10, New Delhi, pp. 8–48.Google Scholar
Goswami, P. 1988. Bihu Songs from Assam. Guwahati.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Percival 1967. The History of The Indian Tea Industry. London.Google Scholar
Guha, A. 1977. Planter Raj to Swaraj. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Hodgson, B.H. 1849. ‘A Brief Note on Indian Ethnology’, Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, XVIII, pp. 238–46.Google Scholar
Hodgson, B.H. 1880. On the Origin, Location, Numbers, Creed, Customs, Character and Condition of the Kocch, Bodo and Dhimal People with a general description of the climate they dwell in. (First printed Calcutta, 1847.) In: Miscellaneous Essays Relating to Indian Subjects, Volume 1, Section 1, pp. 1–160. London.Google Scholar
Hunter, W.W. 1879. A Statistical Account of Assam. London, Volume 1.Google Scholar
India Office Library Records, Economic Department, L/E/7/1181/57 and L/E/7/1354/3296; 26 May 1921–1, Dec 1922, and 1921–29, Oriental and India Office Collection, British Library.Google Scholar
Jenkins, F. 1849–50. Report on the Revenue Administration of the Province of Assam. Manuscript, Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies, Guwahati, Assam.Google Scholar
Kaye, J.W. & Forbes, Watson J. (eds.). 1868. People of India. London, Volume 1.Google Scholar
Khadria, N. 1990–91. Internal Trade and Market Network in the Brahmaputra Valley, 1826–73. Indian Historical Review. 17 (1–2).Google Scholar
Lees, W.N. 1866. Memorandum written after a Tour through the Tea Districts of Eastern Bengal in 1864–5. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Mintz, S. 1985. Sweetness and Power. New York.Google Scholar
Miscellaneous Papers, District Record Office, Jorhat. Tour Diary of Deputy Commissioner, 1898.Google Scholar
Misra, P. 1984. ‘The Communist Party of India in Assam: A Brief History’, North-East Quarterly, 2 (1): July.Google Scholar
Moffat Mills, A.J. 1854. Report on the Province of Assam. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Mullen, C.S. 1932. Report on Census of Assam, 1931: Vol. 3, Assam: Part 1, Report. Shillong.Google Scholar
National Archives of India. 1858. Home Public Proceedings, No. 15–18, 10 September.Google Scholar
National Archives of India. 1861. Home Public Proceedings, No. 88, 30 November.Google Scholar
National Archives of India. Foreign Political Consultations, No. 106–8, 6 June, 1833–6.Google Scholar
National Archives of India. Foreign Political Consultations, Nos. 106–8, 6 June, 1833.Google Scholar
National Archives of India. Home Political Proceedings. Nos. 15–18, 10 September, 1858.Google Scholar
Carnegie Letters, Oriental and India Office Collection, Mss. Eur. D 682, British Library.Google Scholar
Patgiri, N. & Deka, K. (eds.). 1996. Gandhibadi Neta Robin Kalita (The Gandhian leader Robin Kalita). Guwahati.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Assam Legislative Council, 12 March 1929, Volume 9, No. 4 Shillong.Google Scholar
Ramsden, A.R. 1944. Assam Planter: Tea Planting and Hunting in the Assam Jungle. London.Google Scholar
Records of the Government of Bengal, No. 37. 1859–61. Papers relating to Tea Cultivation in Assam. Calcutta, pp. 33, 812.Google Scholar
Records of the Government of Bengal, 1873. Papers regarding the Tea Industry.Google Scholar
Report of the Assam Labour Enquiry Committee, 1906. Calcutta, 1906.Google Scholar
Report of the Indian Statutory Commission. 1930, Volume 14.Google Scholar
Report of the Labour Enquiry Commission of Bengal. 1896. Calcutta.Google Scholar
Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. 1930. London, Volume 6, Part 1.Google Scholar
Report on the Census of Assam for 1881. Calcutta, 1883.Google Scholar
Reports of the Local Board, 1840–42. 1841. Calcutta, Appendix D.Google Scholar
Robb, P. 1997. The Colonial State and Constructions of Indian Identity: An Example on the Northeast Frontier in the 1880s, Modern Asian Studies, 31 (2): 245–83.Google Scholar
Royal Opium Commission for India. 1895. Minutes of Evidence, 1894, London, Volume 2.Google Scholar
Sarma, B. 1959. Congressor Kasiyali Rodot (Under the Congress Sun). Guwahati.Google Scholar
Sarma, S. 1875. Assam Companir Biboron (Description of the Assam Company). Sibsagar.Google Scholar
Sen, S. 2002. ‘Questions of Consent: Women's Recruitment for Assam Tea Gardens, 1859–1900’, Studies in History. Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–60.Google Scholar
Skaria, D. 1997. ‘Shades of Wildness: Tribe, Caste and Gender in Western India’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 56 (3): 726–45.Google Scholar
Srivastava, B.K. 1986. ‘Trade Union and Politics: A Study of the Assam Chah Mazdoor Sangh’, Social Research, 6 (1): January–March, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. 1985. Capitalism and Confrontation in Sumatra's Plantation Belt 1870–1979. New Haven.Google Scholar
The Mussalman, 25 February (1921).Google Scholar
The Times, 25 December, 1841. London.Google Scholar
Tinker, H. 1974. A New System of Slavery: The Export of Indian Labour Overseas, 1830–1920. London.Google Scholar
Warren, W.K. 1975. Tea Tales of Assam. Hampshire.Google Scholar