Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:44:11.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the Energy Diplomacies of East Asian States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2012

CHRISTOPHER M. DENT
CHRISTOPHER M. DENT*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds, UK Email: c.m.dent@leeds.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Energy security is one of the major global challenges of the twenty-first century. Intensifying competition for ever scarcer forms of conventional energy resources is causing significant tensions in the international system. East Asia will have a more profound impact on global energy security than any other region as its burgeoning demand for energy fuels, spurred principally by China, is expected to continue growing at over twice the world average in the next few decades. This paper examines the reasons why we may expect the energy diplomacies of East Asian states to become an increasingly salient feature of East Asian states’ foreign policy and international relations in the foreseeable future, and thereby significantly shape the nature of the region's international political economy. It presents a framework of energy diplomacy analysis in order to better understand how East Asian states are formulating their energy diplomacy strategies and actions. The four prime elements of this framework comprise: empirical perspectives and generic task-oriented terms; agential influences on the formation and organization of energy diplomacy practice; the energy–development nexus; and transaction mechanisms of energy diplomacy. The main conclusions are first, mercantilist approaches to energy diplomacy will persist but continue to gradually give way to market institutionalism; second, energy diplomacy will become increasingly linked to other forms of diplomacy, such as trade, environment and development assistance; third, we may expect East Asian states to afford greater priority to multilateral energy co-operation both regionally and in a wider international or global sense as energy security interdependencies deepen; and fourth, East Asia's growing reliance on sourcing energy fuels from outside the region will make it more dependent on stable international energy markets—these markets are becoming increasingly internationalized and globalized, which will broaden the future options of East Asian states developing new international energy partnerships.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 935 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Referring to Northeast Asia (China, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Mongolia, Taiwan) and Southeast Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, which comprise the membership of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ASEAN).

2 International Energy Agency (2010) World Energy Outlook 2010, International Energy Agency (IEA), ParisGoogle Scholar.

3 Froggatt, A. and Lahn, G. (2010) Sustainable Energy Security: Strategic Risks and Opportunities for Business, London: Lloyds, Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar.

4 Itoh, S. (2008) ‘China's Surging Energy Demand: Trigger for Conflict or Co-operation with Japan?’, East Asia, 25:1, 79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Liao, J. X. (2008) ‘Sino-Japanese Energy Security and Regional Stability: The Case of the East China Sea Gas Exploration’, East Asia, 25:1, 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saha, P. C. (2003) ‘Sustainable Energy Development: A Challenge for Asia and the Pacific Region in the 21st Century’, Energy Policy, 31:11, 1051–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wesley, M. (ed.) (2007) Energy Security in Asia, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar.

5 Wesley, Energy Security in East Asia; Lai, H. (ed.) (2009) Asian Energy Security: The Maritime Dimension, Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Pomfret, R. (2009) ‘Energy Security in the EU and Beyond’, paper presented at the 6th CASE International Conference: The Return of History: From Consensus to Crisis, WarsawGoogle Scholar, 20–21 November.

7 Clingendael International Energy Programme (CIEP), (2007) Energised Foreign Policy: Security of Energy Supply as a New Key Objective, The Hague: report prepared for the Advisory Council on International Affairs/General Energy Council (The Netherlands).

8 Fortov, V. E., Makarov, A. A. and Mitrova, T. A. (2007) ‘Global Energy Security: Problems and Solutions’, Science and Society, 77:1, 7–14Google Scholar.

9 Yergin, D. (2006) ‘Ensuring Energy Security’, Foreign Affairs, 85:2, 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Research and Information System for Developing Countries (2005) ‘Towards an Asian Energy Community: An Exploration’, presented at Asian Economic Integration: Towards an Asian Economic Community, New Delhi, 18–19 November.

11 Froggatt and Lahn, Sustainable Energy Security: Strategic Risks and Opportunities for Business, pp. 6–7.

12 Hamon, D. W. and Dupuy, A. C. (2008) ‘Security of Energy: The Conflict After Next?’, Strategic Insights, 7:1Google Scholar, available at: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ada519723 [accessed 2 November 2012]; Klare, M.T. (2008) ‘The New Geopolitics of Oil’, The Nation, 19 May; Moran, D. and Russell, J.A. (2008) ‘The Militarization of Energy Security’, Strategic Insights, 7:1Google Scholar, available at: http://www.nps.edu/Academics/centers/CCC/faculty/biolinks/russell/The%20Militarization%20of%20Energy%20SecurityJune08.pdf [accessed 2 November 2012]; Morse, E. L. and Richard, J. (2002) ‘The Battle for Energy Dominance’, Foreign Affairs, 81:2, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stokes, D. (2007) ‘Blood for Oil? Global Capital, Counter-Insurgency and the Dual Logic of American Energy Security’, Review of International Studies, 33:2, 245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Victor, D. (2007) ‘What Resource Wars?’, National Interest, 12 November.

13 Victor, What Resource Wars?, pp. 48–55.

14 Verrastro, F. and Ladislaw, S. (2007) ‘Providing Energy Security in an Interdependent World’, The Washington Quarterly, 30:4, 95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Chester, L. (2010) ‘Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature’, Energy Policy, 38:2, 887–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Jaffe, A. M. and Lewis, S. W. (2002) ‘Beijing's Oil Dependency’, Survival, 44:1, 115–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Chester, Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature; Correlje, A. and van der Linde, C. (2006) ‘Energy Supply Security and Geopolitics: A European Perspective’, Energy Policy, 34:5, 532–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (2007) Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on Energy, DBERR, London, pp. 8, 17Google Scholar.

19 Chester, Conceptualising Energy Security and Making Explicit its Polysemic Nature.

20 Lai, H. (ed.) (2009) Asian Energy Security: The Maritime Dimension, Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Accenture (2006), The National Oil Company: Transforming the Competitive Landscape of Global Energy, Kronberg: Accenture. Available at: www.accenture.com; Mommer, B. (2000) The Governance of International Oil: The Changing Rules of the Game, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Working Paper No. 26, OIES, Oxford; Umbach, F. (2010) ‘Global Energy Security and the Implications for the EU’, Energy Policy, 38:3, 1229–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Umbach, Global Energy Security and the Implications for the EU.

23 Matutinovic, I. (2009) ‘Oil and the Political Economy of Energy’, Energy Policy, 37:11, 4251–4258CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 BP (2011) Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2011, BP, London.

25 Pomfret, Energy Security in the EU and Beyond.

26 Rachman, G. (2010) ‘Shale Gas will Change the World’, Financial Times, 24th May.

27 International Group of LNG Importers (2009) The LNG Industry, 2008, GIIGNL, Levallois, France.

28 Nicola, S. (2010) ‘Wind Power Goes Mainstream, and Feels China Breathing Down its Neck’, European Energy Review, 18 June 2010, available at: http://www.europeanenergyreview.eu/index.php?id=2090 [accessed 24 October 2012. Needs free log-in to download article].

29 Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2010) From Pioneer to Mainstream: Evolution of Wind Energy Markets, RBSC, Munich.

30 Froggatt and Lahn, Sustainable Energy Security: Strategic Risks and Opportunities for Business.

31 Kirton, J. (2006) ‘The G8 and Global Energy Governance: Past Performance, St Petersburg Opportunities’, paper presented at The World Dimension of Russia's Energy Security conference, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, MoscowGoogle Scholar, 21 April.

32 Marketos, T. N. (2009) China's Energy Geopolitics: The Shanghai Co-operation Organisation and Central Asia, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar.

33 Seliger, B. and Kim, G. E. (2009) ‘Tackling climate change, increasing energy security, engaging North Korea and moving forward Northeast Asian integration: “Green Growth” in Korea and the Gobitec project’, Gobitec Outline Paper, No.1-03, Gobitec, SeoulGoogle Scholar.

34 National Bureau of Asian Research (2009) Pacific Energy Summit: 2009 Report, National Bureau of Asian Research, Washington DC.

35 Research interview with ECT representative, May 2010, Brussels.

36 Barston, R. P. (2006) Modern Diplomacy, Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar; Berridge, G. R. (2010) Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Palgrave, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jönsson, C. and Langhorne, R., (eds) (2004) Diplomacy, Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leguey-Feilleux, J. R. (2008) The Dynamics of Diplomacy, Lynne Rienner, Boulder, USAGoogle Scholar.

37 Ciuta, F. (2010) ‘Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security?’, Security Dialogue, 41:2, 123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 GCC comprises Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.

39 Bridges Digest, Year 14, no. 2, February–April 2010, p. 7.

40 Risse-Kappen, T. (1995) ‘Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What Have We Learned?, in Risse-Kappen, T. (ed.) Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Downs, E. S. (2008) ‘China's “New” Energy Administration’, China Business Review, November–December, pp. 42–45.

42 United National Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), (2010) Clean Development Mechanism, Annual Report 2010, UNFCCC, Bonn.

43 Saha, Sustainable Energy Development; Wesley, Energy Security in Asia.

44 Research interviews with Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Bureau of Energy representatives, Taipei, June 2010.

45 Research interviews with CPC representatives, Taipei, June 2010.

46 Japan Oil, Gas and Metal National Corporation, JAPEX: Japan Petroleum Exploration Co., Ltd. INPEX: International Petroleum Exploration Corporation.

47 Mitchell, J. and Lahn, G. (2007) ‘Oil for Asia’, Chatham House Briefing Paper, March, Royal Institute of International Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar; Zhang, C. (2010) ‘China's Energy Diplomacy in Africa: The Convergence of National and Corporate Interests’, in Dent, C. M. (ed.) China and Africa Development Relations, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar.

48 Paik, K. W., Marcel, V., Lahn, G., Mitchell, J. V. and Adylov, E. (2007) ‘Trends in Asian NOC Investment Abroad’, Chatham House Working Background Paper, March, Royal Institute of International Affairs LondonGoogle Scholar.

49 According to CPC representatives, most of Taiwan's options for importing Latin American oil are not economically viable owing to transportation cost and crude oil quality factors. Research interview, Taipei, June 2010.

50 Paik et al., Trends in Asian NOC Investment Abroad.

51 Goldstein, L. and Kozyrev, V. (2006) ‘China, Japan and the Scramble for Siberia’, Survival, 48:1, 163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Lim, T. W. (2011) ‘The Energy Triangle of Japan, China and Russia: The Political Economics of Tokyo, Beijing and the East Siberian Pipeline’, International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 6:1, 30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Zhao, S. (2008) ‘China's Global Search for Energy Security: Co-operation and Competition in the Asia-Pacific’, Journal of Contemporary China, 17:55, 207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Sovacool, B. (2011) ‘The Interpretive Flexibility of Oil and Gas Pipelines: Case Studies from Southeast Asia and the Caspian Sea’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78:4, 610–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar.