Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:39:09.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modification of Polymeric Surfaces With Plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

As adaptable as polymeric materials are in their many applications to our daily lives, the need exists to tailor the polymer surfaces to provide even more flexibility in regard to their uses. Plasma treatments offer an unprecedented spectrum of possible surface modifications to enhance polymers, ranging from simple topographical changes to creation of surface chemistries and coatings that are radically different from the bulk polymer. Furthermore plasma treatments are environmentally friendly and economical in regard to their use of materials.

Plasma processing can be classified into at least four categories that often overlap. These are the following: (1) surface preparation by breakdown of surface oils and loose contaminates, (2) etching of new topographies, (3) surface activation by creation or grafting of new functional groups or chemically reactive, excited metastable species on the surface, and (4) deposition of monolithic, adherent surface coatings by polymerization of monomeric species on the surface. Key features of these processes will be briefly discussed, with a rudimentary introduction to the chemistries involved, as well as examples. Focus is placed on capacitively coupled radio-frequency (rf) plasmas (see Figure 1 in the article by Lieberman et al. in this issue of MRS Bulletin) since they are most commonly used in polymer treatment.

Type
Plasma Processing of Advanced Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kolluri, S., HIMONT Plasma Science Technical Note (unpublished).Google Scholar
2.Yasuda, T., Okuno, T., Miyama, M., and Yasuda, H., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 (1990) p. 457.Google Scholar
3.Kaplan, S., Rose, P., Sorlien, P., and Styrmo, O., AUTOPLAS '92 (Schotland Group, Dusseldorf, 1992) p. 255.Google Scholar
4.Kaplan, S. and Hozbor, M., Society of Plastic Engineers 1995 RETEC, Ypsilanti, MI, March 1995 (ECM Inc., Plymouth, MI, 1994) p. 23.Google Scholar
5.Pan, Y., Barrios, E., and Denton, D. (private communication).Google Scholar
6.Engelman, R. and Yasuda, H., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 (1990) p. 19.Google Scholar
7.Gombotz, W. and Hoffman, A., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 56 (1987) p. 720.Google Scholar
8.Griesser, H. and Chatelier, R., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 (1990) p. 274.Google Scholar
9.Schram, D., Kroesen, G., and Beulens, J., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 p. 25.Google Scholar
10.Smolinsky, G. and Vasile, M., Symp. Plasma Chem. Polym., edited by Shen, M. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1976) p. 105.Google Scholar
11.Yasuda, H., Plasma Polymerization (Academic Press, Orlando, 1985).Google Scholar
12.d'Agostino, R., Fracassi, F., and Illuzi, F., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 62 (1990) p. 157.Google Scholar
13.Morosoff, N., Crist, B., Bumgarner, M., Hsu, T., and Yasuda, H., Symp. Plasma Chemistry of Polymers, edited by Shen, M. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1976) p. 83.Google Scholar