Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:59:43.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pulsed Laser Deposition: Future Directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

T. Venkatesan ,
X.D. Wu ,
R. Muenchausen  and
A. Pique
Get access

Extract

Despite the discovery of the laser a few decades ago, the potential for pulsed laser deposition (PLD) of thin films has remained unexploited. Despite the sustained pioneering work at Rockwell in laser deposition, it took the development of high-temperature superconductors to fully realize the technique's potential. Early work on PLD of high-temperature superconductors demonstrated for the first time that the composition of rather complex multi-elementary materials can be reproduced in the deposited film under appropriate conditions of laser energy density and deposition angle. These features made PLD unique; and once the recipe for making in-situ crystalline films of proper stoichiometry was known, the technique's popularity was significantly enhanced in the research community.

The features of laser deposition that make the process so unique, and that are discussed throughout this issue, are recapped below:

1. Rather complex multi-elementary materials can be deposited well if a single-phase, homogeneous target can be fabricated. The complexity of the deposition process is translated to the relatively easier process of fabricating a high-quality target.

2. The chamber pressure, target-substrate distance, target orientation with respect to the laser beam, etc. are significantly de-coupled, enabling significant freedom in deposition system design. The target is decoupled from the substrate in the sense that a small target can be used to deposit film over a fairly large area substrate with the appropriate scanning schemes.

3. The efficiency of the target use is superior compared to any other technique since a predominant amount of the evaporated material is forward directed and can be collected with a high degree of efficiency. For example, in a production environment, more than 100 YBCO films (ranging 3,000-4,000 Å thick) on 1 × 1 cm2 substrates have been fabricated from a 0.25-inch-thick one-inch target with a majority of the target still left over. The cost of raw materials in a production environment may become significant, and for toxic elements particularly there is a further advantage in minimizing the spread of contaminants.

Type
Pulsed Laser Deposition
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 17 , Issue 2: Pulsed Laser Deposition , February 1992 , pp. 54 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ready, J.F., Effects of High Power Laser Radiation (Academic Press, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
2. Cheung, J.P. and Sankur, H., CRC Critical Reviews, Solid State Materials Sciences, 15 (1988) p. 63.Google Scholar
3. Dijkkamp, D., Venkatesan, T., Wu, X.D., Shaheen, S.A., Jisrawi, N., Min-Lee, Y.H., McLean, W.L., and Croft, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (1987) p. 619; X.D. Wu, D. Dijkkamp, S.B. Ogale, A. Inam, E.W. Chase, P.F. Micelli, C.C. Chang, J.M. Tarascon, and T. Venkatesan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51 (1987) p. 861.Google Scholar
4. Venkatesan, T., Wu, X.D., Inam, A., and Wachtman, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) p. 1193.Google Scholar
5. Inam, A., Hegde, M.S., Wu, X.D., Venkatesan, T., England, P., Miceli, P.F., Chase, E.W., Chang, C.C., Tarascon, J.M., and Wachtman, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 (1988) p. 908.Google Scholar
6. Mathews, S., Neocera, Inc. (College Park, MD). Private communication.Google Scholar
7. At STI, Inc. (Santa Barbara CA) pulsed laser deposition is used to produce their commercial thallium-based superconducting thin films. The films are produced primarily by a post annealing technique, but from the point of view of preserving stoichiometry and minimizing contamination, the technique has been particularly unique.Google Scholar
8. Using pulsed laser deposition, a 15-layered integrated SQUID and a flux transformer coil have been successfully fabricated on a single chip at Conductus, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA).Google Scholar
9. Yilmaz, S., Venkatesan, T., Gerhard-Multhaupt, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 2479.Google Scholar
10. Ramesh, R., Luther, K., Wilkens, B., Hart, D.L., Wang, E., Tarascon, J.M., Inam, A., Wu, X.D., and Venkatesan, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (1990) p. 1505.Google Scholar
11. Ramesh, R., Inam, A., Wilkens, B., Chan, W.K., Hart, D.L., Luther, K., and Parascon, J.M., Science 252 (1991) p. 944.Google Scholar
12. Foltyn, S.R., Dye, R.C., Ott, K.C., Hubbard, K.M., Hutchinson, W., Muenchausen, R.E., Estler, R.C., and Wu, X.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (1991) p. 594.Google Scholar
13. Lowndes, D., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Private Communications.Google Scholar
14. Edwards, R., Neocera, Inc. (College Park, MD). Private communication.Google Scholar
15. Wu, X.D., Muenchausen, R.E., Foltyn, S., Estler, R.C., Flamme, C., Nogar, N., Garcia, A.R., Martin, J., and Tesmer, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1990) p. 1481.Google Scholar
16. Wu, X.D., Muenchausen, R.E., Foltyn, S., Estler, R.C., Dye, R.C., Garcia, A.R., Nogar, N., England, P., Ramesh, R., Hwang, D.M., Ravi, T.S., Chang, C.C., Venkatesan, T., Xi, X.X., Li, Q., and Inam, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 (1990) p. 523.Google Scholar
17. Greer, J.A. and Hook, J.B., SPIE Proceedings 79 (1990) p. 1377.Google Scholar
18. Muenchausen, R.E., Dye, R.C., Wu, X.D., Luo, L., and Cooke, D.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (1991) p. 1374.Google Scholar
19. Witanachchi, S., Kwok, H.S., Wang, X.W., and Shaw, D.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 (1988) p. 234.Google Scholar
20. Singh, R.K., Narayan, J., Singh, A.K., and Krishnaswamy, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 (1989) p. 2271.Google Scholar
21. Li, Q., Xi, X.X., Wu, X.D., Inam, A., Vadlamannati, S., McLean, W.L., Venkatesan, T., Ramesh, R., Hwang, D.M., Martinez, J.A., and Nazar, L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) p. 3086.Google Scholar
22. Lowndes, D.H., Norton, D.P., and Budai, J.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) p. 1160.Google Scholar
23. For example, for a $20,000 difference the laser pulse energy can be increased by 50%, while for a similar price difference the repetition rate can be increased by an order of magnitude. Private communication with Gerard Zaal of Lambda Physik.Google Scholar
24. Kanai, M., Kawai, T., and Kawai, S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 (1991) p. 771.Google Scholar
25. Surface Processing and Laser Assisted Chemistry, edited by Boyd, I.W., Fogarassy, E., and Stuke, M. (European Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, Amsterdam and New York, 1990).Google Scholar