Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-68sx7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:59:48.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical Cooling Rate Vs. Reduced Glass Transition: Scaling Factors and Master Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Clavaguera  and
M. T. Clavaguera-Mora
N. Clavaguera
Affiliation:
Grup de Física de l'Estat Sòblid, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, Diagonal 647, 08028-Barcelona, Spain.
M. T. Clavaguera-Mora
Affiliation:
Grup de Física de Materials I, Facultat de Cièencies, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Spain.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to analyse the glass formation and stability of bulk metallic glasses. Attention is focused to metallic alloys as systems which may develop a large glassforming ability. Glass formation when quenching from the liquid state is discussed in terms of the thermodynamics and kinetics of the stable/metastable competing phases. Thermodynamics is required to relate glass transition temperature, Tg, to the energetics of the supercooled liquid. Kinetic destabilisation of equilibrium solidification and, consequently, glass forming ability are favoured by the high viscosity values achieved under continuous cooling. The relative thermal stability of the supercooled liquid depends on the thermodynamic driving force and interfacial energy between each competing nucleating phase and the molten alloy. It is shown that the quantities representative of the process, once scaled, have a temperature dependence that is mostly fixed by the reduced glass transition temperature, Tgr= Tg/Tm, Tm being the melting temperature. Based on the classical models of nucleation and crystal growth, the reduced critical cooling rate is shown to follow master curves when plotted against Tgr. Experimental trends for specific systems are compared to predicted values from these master curves.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 554: Symposium MM – Bulk Metallic Glasses , 1998 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Inoue, A., Proc. Japan Acad. 73, Ser. B, p. 19 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Uhlmannn, R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 7, p. 337 (1972).Google Scholar
3. Clavaguera, N., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162, p. 40 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Clavaguera, N., and Clavaguera-Mora, M.T.,. Mater. Sci. & Eng. A179/A180, p. 288 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Clavaguera, N., and Clavaguera-Mora, M.T.,.in: Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Phase Transformations edited by Im, J.S., Park, B., Greer, A.L., and Stephenson, G. B., (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 398, Pittsburgh, PA 1996) p. 319–24.Google Scholar
6. Clavaguera-Mora, M.T. and N.Clavaguera, J. Alloys & Comp. 247, p. 93 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Chen, H.S., and Turnbull, D., J. Appl. Phys. 38, p. 3,646 (1967).Google Scholar
8. Kauzmann, W., Chem. Rev. 43, p. 305 (1948).Google Scholar
9. M.T.Clavaguera-Mora and Clavaguera, N., J. Mater. Res. 4, p. 906 (1989).Google Scholar
10. Clavaguera-Mora, M.T., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 102, p. 1,291 (1998).Google Scholar
11. Turnbull, D., Contemp. Phys. 10 (1969) p. 473.Google Scholar
12. Christian, J.W., The theory of phase transformations in metals and alloys, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965, pp. 525–48.Google Scholar
13. Masumoto, T., Mater. Sci. Eng. A179/180, p. 8 (1994)Google Scholar
14. Inoue, A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A226, p. 357 (1997)Google Scholar