Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:10:18.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Damage and Dopant on the Blister Formation in Hydrogen Implanted Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Hochbauer
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
M. Nastasi
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545
S.S. Lau
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 92093-0407
Y. Zheng
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. 92093-0407
J. W. Mayer
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, 85287-1704
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the formation of surface blisters in <100> n-type silicon following coimplantation with boron and hydrogen. In this work we study the effect of having the boron depth larger than the hydrogen depth. The silicon substrates had four different dopant levels, ranging from 1014 cm−3 to 1019 cm−3. The Si substrates were first implanted with B ions at 240 keV (Rp = 705nm) to a dose of 1015cm−2. Some of the B implanted samples were left in their as-implanted state, others were given a rapid thermal anneal (RTA) at 900°C. Boron implanted and virgin n-type Si samples were then implanted at cryogenic temperatures with 40 keV H+ (Rp= 475nm) to a dose of 5 x 1016 cm−2. Following H+ implantation, all the samples were vacuum annealed at 390°C for 10 minutes and examined for hydrogen blister formation. No blistering was observed in samples implanted with H only. In all cases, the blister depth was consistently found to be strongly correlated with H damage profile rather than the H or B concentration profiles. These results will be discussed in terms of defect-dopant interactions and the influence of doping on H kinetics and H-bubble nucleation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bruel, M., Aspar, B., Charlet, B., Maleville, C., Poumeyrol, T., Soubie, A., Auberton-Herve, A.J., Lamure, J.M., Barge, T., Metral, F., and Trucchi, S., (Proc. IEEE Tucson, Arizona 1995), p. 178 Google Scholar
2. Bruel, M., Nucl. Instrum,. Methods Phys. Res. B 108, p. 313 (1996)Google Scholar
3. Kaminski, M., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 18, No.4, p. 208 (1971)Google Scholar
4. Weldon, M.K., Marsico, V.E., Chabal, Y.J., Agarwal, A., Eaglesham, D.J., Sapjeta, J., Brown, W.L., Jacobson, D.C., Caudano, Y., and Christman, S.B., J. of Vac. Sci. and Tech. B 15 (#4). p. 1,065 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Freund, L.B., Appl. Phys. Lett 70, p. 3,519 (1997)Google Scholar
6. Cerofolini, G.F.. Meda, L., Balboni, R., Corni, F., Frabboni, S., Ottaviani, G., Tonini, R., Anderle, M. and Canteri, R., Physical Review B 46, p. 2,061 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Marwick, A.D., Oehrlein, G.S. and Wittmer, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, p. 198 (1991)Google Scholar
8. Tong, Q.-Y., Scholz, R. and Gtisele, U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, p. 49 (1998)Google Scholar
9. Barbour, J.C., and Doyle, B.L., in Handbook of Ion Beam Materials Analysis, edited by Tesmer, J.R., and Nastasi, M. (Mater. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA 1995) chapter 5Google Scholar
10. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.B. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, Pergamon, New York, 1985 Google Scholar
11. Fink, D., Krauser, J., Nagengast, D., Murphy, T. Almeida, Erxmeier, J., Palmetshofer, L., Briunig, D., and Weidinger, A., Appl. Phys. A 61, p. 381 (1995)Google Scholar
12. Hbchbauer, T., Nastasi, M., Walter, K.C., Schwarz, R.B., Bower, R.W., and Ensinger, W., J. Appl. Phys., submitted 114 Google Scholar