Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:26:18.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure and Interfacial Reactions in RuO2/Ta2N Precision Thin Film Resistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Erming Ma
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Amherst, NY 14260, U.S.A.
Rick L. Wallace
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Amherst, NY 14260, U.S.A.
Wayne A. Anderson
Affiliation:
State University of New York at Buffalo, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Amherst, NY 14260, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Ruthenium oxide (RuO2) / tantalum nitride (Ta2N) precision thin film resistors were fabricated by dc magnetron reactive sputtering. Proper thermal treatment was utilized to tune the temperature coefficient of resistance (TCR) to near zero. The TCR of these samples could be easily tuned to ±10 ppm/°C. Accelerated life time (ALT) tests at 150 °C for up to 1000 hours demonstrated very good stability both in p□(Δp/p≤0.5%)and TCR (ΔTCR ≤ ±2 ppm/°C). Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) showed that the RuO2 cap layer became deficient in oxygen after annealing, with Ru-Ta-O and Ta2O5 sublayers as the interfacial reaction products. The upper layer of Ta2N was oxidized. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that the sample underwent a (re)crystallization. The as-deposited Ta2N was a uniform amorphous phase, and the as-deposited RuO2 possessed fine microcrystals embedded in an amorphous matrix. Crystallization and oxidation occurred in the Ta2N film during annealing, with recrystallization and oxygen redistribution in the RuO2 film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Coyne, H.J. Jr, and Tauber, R.N., J. Appl. Phys. 39(12), 5585 (1968)Google Scholar
2. Hardy, W.R., Shewchun, J., Kuenzig, D. and Tam, C., Thin Solid Films 8, 81 (1971)Google Scholar
3. Waterhouse, N., Proc. 22nd Electron Components Conf. 58 (1972)Google Scholar
4. Au, C.L. and Anerson, W.A., J. Mater. Res. 5(6), 1224 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Si, J. and Desu, S.B., J. Mater. Res. 8(10), 2644 (1993)Google Scholar
6. Jia, Q.X., Jiao, K.L. and Anderson, W.A., Mat. Sci. And Eng. B18, 220 (1993)Google Scholar
7. Ibidunni, A.O., Oxidation of Metals 40 (1/2), 5 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Jia, Q.X., Jiao, K.L. and Anderson, W.A., Mat. Sci. And Eng. B20, 301 (1993)Google Scholar
9. Ibidunni, A.O., Masaitis, R.L., Opila, R.L., Davenport, A.J., Isaacs, H.S. and Taylor, J.A., Surf. and Interface Analy. 20, 559 (1993)Google Scholar
10. Jia, Q.X., Lee, H.J., Ma, E., Anderson, W.A. and Collins, F.M., J. Mater. Res., submitted.Google Scholar
11. Sun, X., Kolawa, E., Chen, J.S., Reid, J.S. and Nicolet, M.A., Thin Solid Films 236, 347 (1993)Google Scholar
12. Mooij, J.H., Phys. Status Solidi A17, 521 (1973)Google Scholar
13. Neugebauer, C.A. and Webb, M.B., J. Appl. Phys. 33(1), 74 (1962)Google Scholar
14. Egami, T. and Ichikawa, T., Mat. Sci. And Eng. 32, 293 (1978)Google Scholar
15. Mar, S.Y., Liang, J.S., Sun, C.Y. and Huang, Y.S., Thin Solid Films 238, 158 (1994)Google Scholar
16. Badrinarayanan, S. and Sinha, S., J. Appl. Phys. 69(1), 1141 (1991)Google Scholar