Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:00:39.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Stress Distribution in Feal Weld Overlay on Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

X.-L. Wang ,
S. Spooner ,
C. R. Hubbard ,
P. J. Maziasz ,
G. M. Goodwin ,
Z. Feng  and
T. Zacharia
X.-L. Wang
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
S. Spooner
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
C. R. Hubbard
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
P. J. Maziasz
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
G. M. Goodwin
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
Z. Feng
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
T. Zacharia
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak, Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

Neutron diffraction was used to measure the residual stress distribution in an FeAl weld overlay on steel. It was found that the residual stresses accumulated during welding were essentially removed by the post-weld heat treatment that was applied to the specimen; most residual stresses in the specimen developed during cooling following the post-weld heat treatment. The experimental data were compared with a plasto-elastic finite element analysis. While some disagreement exists in absolute strain values, there is satisfactory agreement in strain spatial distribution between the experimental data and the finite element analysis.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 364: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys–VI , 1994 , 109
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liu, C. T., Sikka, V. K., and McKamey, C. G., Alloy Development of FeAl Alloys for Structural Use in Corrosive Environments, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-12199 (February 1993)Google Scholar
2. Maziasz, P. J., Goodwin, G. M., Liu, C. T., and David, S. A., Scripta Metall. Mat., 27, 1835 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Porter, W. D. and Maziasz, P. J., Scripta Metall. Mat., 29, 1043 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Iancu, O. T., Munz, D., Eigenmann, B., Scholtes, B., and Macherauch, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73, 1144–49 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Wang, X.-L., Hubbard, C. R., Spooner, S., David, S. A., Rabin, B. H., and Williamson, R. L., submitted to Mat. Sci. Eng. Google Scholar
6. Webster, P. J., pp. 95 in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Trends in Welding Science and Technologies, ASM, Materials Park, OH 44073Google Scholar
7. Schneibel, J. H., “Selected Properties of Iron Aluminides,” pp. 329–42 in Processing, Properties, and Applications of Iron Aluminides, Schneibel, J. H. and Crimp, M. A., eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA (1994).Google Scholar
8. ABAQUS Releases 5.3–1, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI (1993).Google Scholar
9. Feng, Z. et al., unpublished.Google Scholar