Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:43:17.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Accumulation and Recovery of Irradiation Effects in Silicon Carbide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W.J. Weber
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richiand, WA 99352
W. Jiang
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richiand, WA 99352
S. Thevuthasan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richiand, WA 99352
D.E. Mecready
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richiand, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

Single crystals of 6H-SiC have been irradiated with a variety of ions over a wide range of fluences and temperatures. The temperature and dose dependence of damage accumulation has been investigated using in-situ Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry in channeling geometry. At low temperatures, the accumulation of structural disorder exhibits a sigmoidal dependence on dose. At room temperature and higher, simultaneous recovery processes during irradiation significantly reduce the damage accumulation rates by up to a factor of five. Isochronal and isothermal annealing studies have been used to study the damage recovery behavior. For low defect concentrations introduced by 550 keV Si+ irradiation at 160 K, complete recovery is observed at 300 K. However, defects introduced by He+ irradiation on the Si sublattice are more difficult to anneal at room temperature, which suggests trapping of the implanted helium may inhibit defect recombination. Below room temperature, the thermal recovery of defects on the Si sublattice has an activation energy on the order of 0.3 ± 0.1 eV. Defect recovery above 570 K has an activation energy on the order of 1.5 ± 0.3 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Wendler, E., Heft, A. and Wesch, W., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods. B 141, 105 (1998).Google Scholar
[2] Weber, W.J., Yu, N., Wang, L.M., and Hess, N.J., Mater. Sci. and Engr. A 253, 62 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Devanathan, R., Rubia, T. Diaz de la, and Weber, W.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 253, 47 (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Devanathan, R., Weber, W.J., and Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods B 141, 118 (1998).Google Scholar
[5] Snead, L.L. and Zinkle, S.J., in Microstructure Evolution During Irradiation, edited by Robertson, I.M., Was, G.S., Hobbs, L.W., and Rubia, T. Diaz de Ia (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), p. 595.Google Scholar
[6] Weber, W.J., Yu, N., Wang, L.M., and Hess, N.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 244, 258 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Jiang, W., Weber, W.J., Thevuthansan, S., and McCready, D.E., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods B 143, 333 (1998).Google Scholar
[8] Jiang, W., Weber, W.J., Thevuthasan, S., McCready, D.E., J. Nucl. Mater. 257, 295 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Ziegler, J. F., Biearsack, J. P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
[10] Zinkle, S.J. and Kinoshita, C., J. Nucl. Mater. 251, 200 (1997).Google Scholar
[11] Devanathan, R., Private Communication.Google Scholar
[12] Grimaldi, M.G., Calcagno, L., Musumeci, P., Frangis, N., and Landuyt, J. Van, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 1 (1997).Google Scholar
[13] Weber, W.J., J. Nucl. Mater. 98, 206 (1981).Google Scholar
[14] Damask, A. C. and Dienes, G. J., Point Defects in Metals (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1971), p.151.Google Scholar
[15] Primak, W., Fuchs, L.H., and Day, P.P., Phys. Rev. 103, 1184 (1956).Google Scholar