Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:28:49.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aqueous Diffusion in Repository and Backfill Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

James L. Conca ,
Mick Apted  and
Randy Arthur
James L. Conca
Affiliation:
Washington State University Tri-Cities, 100 Sprout Rd, Richland, WA 99352
Mick Apted
Affiliation:
INTERA Sciences, Denver, CO
Randy Arthur
Affiliation:
INTERA Sciences, Denver, CO
Get access

Abstract

Aqueous diffusion coefficients have been experimentally determined in a variety of porous/fractured geologic and engineered media. For performance assessment applications, the purely diffusive flux must be separated from retardation effects. The simple diffusion coefficient, D, does not include any transient chemical effects, e.g., sorption, which lower the diffusion coefficient for some finite time period until equilibrium is reached. D is primarily a function of volumetric water content, θ, and not material characteristics. At high water contents, D gradually declines as water content decreases, from 10−5 cm2/sec at θ ∼ 50% to 10−7 cm2/sec at θ ∼ 5%, followed by a sharp decline to 10−10 cm2/sec at θ ∼ 0.5%. Although surface diffusion has a strong experimental basis in the transport of gases along metal surfaces, experimental evidence for aqueous geologic/backfill/engineered systems strongly indicates that surface diffusion is not important, even in bentonite, because of the extremely poor connectivity among electric double-layers and the extremely low diffusivities and high ∂C/∂x at small area/point contacts which more than negate the increased flux along intragrain surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 395
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pigford, T. H. and Chambré, P. L., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 112, 125–141 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Conca, J. L. and Wright, J., Applied Hydrogeology 1, 5–24 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Geddes, L. A., DaCosta, C. and Wise, G., Med. B. Eng. 9, 511–521, (1971).Google Scholar
4. Miller, D. G., Estimation of tracer diffusion coefficients of ions in aqueous solution UCRL- 53319, Lawr. Liver. Nat. Lab., Livermore, CA (1972).Google Scholar
5. Conca, J. L. and Wright, J., Water Res. Research 26, 1055–1066 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Bresler, E., McNeal, B. and Carter, D., Saline and Sodic Soils, Springer-Verlag NY (1982).Google Scholar
7. Wright, J., Proceedings of the First International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference 1, 835–842 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Robinson, R. A. and Stokes, R. H., Electrolyte Solutions, Butterworths, London, (1959).Google Scholar
9. Oelkers, E. H., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55, 3515–3529 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Conca, J. L., Proceedings of the First International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference 1, 394–401 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Albinsson, Y. and Engkvist, I., SKB Technical Report 89-22, Stockholm, Sweden (1989).Google Scholar
12. Relyea, J., Trott, D., McIntyre, C. and Rieger, C., Nuclear Technology 74, 317–323 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Riekert, L.. AlChE Journal. 31, 863–864 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Kemper, W., Maasland, D., and Porter, L., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 164–167 (1964).Google Scholar
15. Cheung, S. C. H., Engineering Geology 28, 369–378 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Rasmuson, A. and Neretnieks, I., Surface Migration in Sorption Processes, SKB Technical Report 83-37, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (1983).Google Scholar
17. Skagius, K. and Neretnieks, I.. Diffusion Measurements of Caesium and Strontium in Biotite Gniess, SKB Technical Report 85-15. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm (1985).Google Scholar
18. Bradbury, M. H., Green, A., Lever, D., and Stephen, I. G., Diffusion and Permeability Based Sorption Measurements in Sandstone, Anhydrite and Upper Magnesian Limestone Samples, UKAEA Report AERE-R 11995. United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, Oxfordshire (1986).Google Scholar
19. Berry, J. A. and Bond, K. A., Surface Diffusion of Sorbed Radionuclides, Department of the Environment Report DOE/HMIP/RR/90/076, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom (1990).Google Scholar
20. Put, M. J., Monsecour, M., Fonteyne, A., and Yoshida, H., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV 212, 823–829, MRS Symposium Proceedings (1991).Google Scholar
21. Ashida, T., Sato, H., Kohara, Y., Yui, M., Yusa, Y., and Sasaki, N., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology (in press) (1992).Google Scholar
22. Jurinak, J. J., Sandhu, S., and Dudley, L. M., Soil Sci. Soc. of Am.J. 51, 625–630 (1987).Google Scholar
23. Conca, J. L. and Wright, J. V., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV 212, MRS Symposium Proceedings, 879–884 (1991).Google Scholar
24. Olsen, S. R. and Kemper, W. D., Advances in Agronomy 30, 91–151 (1968).Google Scholar