Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T02:59:40.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assembly Characteristics and Structural Motifs in an Aquatic Insect's Biopolymer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Steven T. Case
Affiliation:
The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Biochemistry, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, U.S.A.
Susan E. Wellman
Affiliation:
The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Biochemistry, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216-4505, U.S.A.
Stavros Hamodrakas
Affiliation:
The University of Athens, Department of Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular Biology and Genetics, Panepistimiopolis, Kouponia, Athens 15701, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Secretory proteins of Chironomus tentans larvae form insoluble fibers that are spun into threads used to construct underwater feeding and pupation tubes. The physical properties of spun fibers should reflect their protein constituents.

The disassembly and reassembly of secretory protein complexes in vitro were studied by solution turbidity, electron microscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy. Secretory proteins were able to reform complexes with a similar morphology and dichroic spectrum to that of native complexes. These complexes are stabilized by electrostatic and disulfide bonds.

cDNA and genomic cloning indicate that spIs, the 1000-kDa secretory proteins, primarily consist of alternating “constant” and “subrepeat” regions. We synthesized and purified synthetic peptides for each region and used circular dichroism and infrared spectroscopy to measure their secondary structure. Constant peptide consists of α-helix and β-turn. Subrepeat peptide consists of poly(Gly) II-type helix and β-turn.

We conclude that spIs form the fibrous backbone of a novel biopolymer with alternating α-helices and poly(Gly)II helices punctuated by β-turns. Such fibers may have unique physical properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wallace, J.B. and Merritt, R.W., Ann. Rev. Entomol. 25, 103132 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Grossbach, U. in Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, Volume 8, edited by Beermann, W. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1977), pp. 147196.Google Scholar
3. Pustell, J., Kafatos, F.C., Wobus, U., and Baulein, H., J. Mol. Evol. 20, 281295 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Wieslander, L., Hoog, C., Hoog, J.-O., Jornvall, H., Lendahl, U., and Daneholt, B., J. Mol. Evol. 20, 304312 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Grond, C., Saiga, H., and Edstrom, J.-E., in Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, Volume 14, edited by Hennig, W. (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987) pp. 6979.Google Scholar
6. Dreesen, T.D., Bower, J.R., and Case, S.T., J. Biol. Chem. 260, 1182411830 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dreesen, T.D., Lezzi, M. and Case, S.T., J. Cell Biol. 106, 2127 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Dignam, S.S., Yang, L., Lezzi, M., and Case, S.T., J. Biol. Chem. 264, 94449452 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dignam, S.S. and Case, S. T., Gene 88, 133140 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Paulsson, G., Lendahl, U., Galli, J., Ericsson, C. and Wieslander, L., J. Mol. Biol. 211, 331349(1990).Google Scholar
12. Wellman, S.E. and Case, S.T., J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1087810883 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wellman, S.E., Hamodrakas, S.J., Kamitsos, E.I., and Case, S.T., submitted (1990).Google Scholar
14. Manavalan, P. and Johnson, W.C., Nature 305, 831832 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Caldwell, J.W. and Applequist, J., Biopolymers 23, 1891–1904.Google Scholar
16. Hamodrakas, S.J. and Kafatos, F.C., J. Mol. Evol. 20, 296303 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar