Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:35:19.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization and Dissolution of ZrTh3UO10 and Th3UO8 Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Gini Curran ,
Yoann Sevestre ,
Wendy Rattray ,
Patrick G. Allen  and
Ken R. Czerwinski
Gini Curran
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NW13-219, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139
Yoann Sevestre
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NW13-219, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139
Wendy Rattray
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NW13-219, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139
Patrick G. Allen
Affiliation:
Seaborg Institute, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave., PO Box 808, L-231, Livermore, CA 94551
Ken R. Czerwinski
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NW13-219, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

Thoria-urania-zirconia ceramics were studied in order to investigate the long-term behavior of potential thorium fuels in a repository environment. The ceramics were prepared by coprecipitation of the metal salts. Zirconia was added to determine if further stabilization against dissolution of the thoria-urania system could be achieved. In addition, 0.5 wt% MgO was added to some samples to increase stability and density. The inclusion of Zr in the ceramics did not dramatically decrease the leaching of thorium from the matrix.

Material properties of the ceramic were analyzed using electron microscopy techniques such as Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS). X-ray diffraction and synchrotron-based x-ray absorption studies including extended xray fine structure (EXAFS) and x-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) were also used to reveal elements of the phase structure and chemistry of the ceramics. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and EDX show that these ceramics separate into a zirconium-based phase and an actinide-based phase with low mutual affinity of thorium and zirconium, as well as partial solubilization of uranium in zirconium. The comparison of EELS spectra collected for the ceramics with spectra collected for UO2 and U3O8 reference materials also allow the assessment of uranium oxidation state independently in the two separate phases. Assessment of the bulk oxidation state using XANES correlated well with the EELS analysis. Interatomic distances and the bulk crystal structure were determined using EXAFS.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 713: Symposium JJ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV , 2002 , JJ11.15
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kazimi, Mujidet al. Advanced Proliferation Resistant, Lower cost, Uranium-Thorium Dioxide Fuels for Light Water Reactors, Nuclear Energy Research Initiative Project 99-0153 Quarterly Report (2000)Google Scholar
2. Gong, W.L.; Lutze, W.; Ewing, R.C., J. Nucl. Mat. 277, 239–249 (2000)Google Scholar
3. Crawford, C.L.; Biddle, C.R.; Bibler, N.E., Durability testing of heavy-ion irradiated crystalline ceramics. Report, WSRC-MS-2000–00309Google Scholar
4. Benedict, Manson; Pigford, T.H.; Levi, H.V., Nuclear Chemical Engineering 2nd Edition. (McGraw-Hill, 1981) pp. 318–321 Google Scholar
5. De Lima, N.B., and Imakuma, K. J. Nucl. Mat. 135, 215–221 (1985)Google Scholar
6. Balek, Vladimir. J. Nucl. Mat. 153, 41–49 (1988)Google Scholar
7. Buck, E.C., Fortner, J.A., Ultramicroscopy 67, 77–81 (1997)Google Scholar
8. Hole, B.T., Laan, G. Van der, Fuggle, J.C., Swatzky, G.A., Karnatak, R.C. and Esteva, J-M., Phys. Rev. B 32, 5107 (1985)Google Scholar
9. Fortner, J.A. and Buck, E.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3817 (1996)Google Scholar
10. Atkins, P.W., Eur. J. Sol. State Inorg. Chem. 28, 9 (1991)Google Scholar
11. Neck, V., and Kim, J.I.,: Radiochim. Acta. 89, 1 (2000)Google Scholar
12. Philips, S.L., Philips, C.A., Skeen, J.: Hydrolysis formation and Ionization Constants at 25°C and at High Temperature—High Ionic Strength, Report LBL -14996, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California, (1985).Google Scholar