Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:54:46.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterizing Soldering Fluxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Laura J. Turbini
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, 778 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245
Garth B. Freeman
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, 778 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245
David Cauffiel
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, 778 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0245
Get access

Abstract

For a number of years electronic manufacturers of printed circuit assemblies have used rosin-based soldering fluxes. Post-solder cleaning was accomplished with chlorinated or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) solvents. With the elimination of these solvent options due to their destructive effect on the stratospheric ozone layer, manufacturers are looking to alternative cleaners for rosin flux or to new flux choices which can be cleaned with water, or left uncleaned.

Many of the flux formulations are new and their long-term effect on the performance of product manufactured with them is unknown. Although ionic contamination testers can alert one to the ionic levels remaining on an assembly, the corrosivity of the residues is not directly related to the total ionic level, but only to certain ionic species. Surface insulation resistance testing is used by many in the industry, but the results are complex and often misunderstood.

All of these factors have been the driving force to develop a quantitative screening test for soldering flux residues. This test, originally conceived by Dr. David Bono, has been modified and developed at Georgia Tech to provide a quantitative evaluation of flux residue corrosivity. This work, in collaboration with the work being performed by the French standards group, will result in a new international industry standard. This paper reports the latest data on this important test development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rubin, W. and Allen, B. M., Trans. IMF, 50, 136 (1972).Google Scholar
2. Bono, D., Soldering and Surface Mount Tech., 2, 22 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Boddy, R. J., Delaney, R. H., Lahti, J. N., Landry, E. F., Restnick, R. C., IEEE Int'l. Rel. Phys. Symp., 108 (1976).Google Scholar