Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:03:55.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Vapor Functionalization of ZnO Nanocrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Moazzam Ali
Affiliation:
moazzam.ali@uni-due.de, University Duisburg-Essen, Nanoparticle Process Technology, Duisburg, Germany
Marty D. Donakowski
Affiliation:
donak065@umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Department of Chemistry, Minneapolis, United States
Markus Winterer
Affiliation:
markus.winterer@scholarone.com, University Duisburg-Essen, Nanoparticle Process Technology, Duisburg, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Chemical Vapor Functionalization (CVF) is a method in which nanocrystals undergo in situ functionalization in the gas phase. In CVF, two reactors are used in series. The first reactor consists of a hot quartz tube (1073 K) where ZnO nanocrystals are synthesized in the gas phase from diethylzinc and oxygen. The second reactor, connected at the exit of the first one and kept at lower temperature (673 K), is used as functionalization chamber. At the connecting point of the two reactors, vapors of organic functionalizing agents are injected which react with the surface of ZnO nanocrystals. ZnO nanocrystals have been functionalized by 1-hexanol, n-hexanoic acid, n-hexanal and 1-hexylamine. Functionalized ZnO nanocrystals have been characterized by Dynamic Light Scattering, X-ray Diffraction and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Mangolini, L. and Kortshagen, U., Adv. Mater. 19, 2513 (2007).Google Scholar
2 Hong, S. J., Kim, Y. H. and Han., J. I. IEEE Transa Transactions on nanotecht 7, 172 (2008).Google Scholar
3 Sagmeister, M., Brossmann, U., List, E. J. W., Ochs, R., Szabo, D. V. and Würschum, R., Phys. Stat. Sol. 2, 203 (2008).Google Scholar
4 Ali, M., Friedenberger, N., Spasova, M. and Winterer, M. Winterer, Chem. Vap. Dep. 15, 192 (2009).Google Scholar
5 Djurisic, A. B. and Leung, Y. H., Small 2, 944, (2006).Google Scholar
6 Ali, M. and Winterer, M., Chem. Mater. 22, 85 (2010).Google Scholar
7 Lutterotti, L., Matthies, S. M and Wenk, H. R., atthies IUCr: Newsletter of the CPD 21, 14 (1999). Program available at http://www.ing.unitn.it/̃maud/Google Scholar
8 Sakohara, S., Ishida, M. and Anderson, M. A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 10169 (1998).Google Scholar