Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T08:45:42.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of a-Si1-xCx:H Layers Based on Methane, Di-, Tri- and Tetrasilylmethane as Feedstocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. Fölsch
Affiliation:
Phototronics Solartechnik GmbH, Hermann-Oberth-Strasse 9, D-8011 Putzbrunn, Federal Republic of Germany
H. Rubel
Affiliation:
Phototronics Solartechnik GmbH, Hermann-Oberth-Strasse 9, D-8011 Putzbrunn, Federal Republic of Germany
H. Schade
Affiliation:
Phototronics Solartechnik GmbH, Hermann-Oberth-Strasse 9, D-8011 Putzbrunn, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

Using standard rf glow discharge deposition, we compare the properties of a-Si1-xCx:H films prepared with different carbon sources, namely methane and di-, tri- and tetrasilylme-thane (DSM, TSM and TetraSM). The optical bandgap EG was varied between 1.8 eV and 2.4 eV. All oua-Si1-xCx:H films exhibit low Urbach energies (EQ < 60 meV for EG< 2.0 eV) and low defect absorption, both determined by PDS. Using the silylmetha-nes as feedstocks, we do not find significant differences relative to our methane-based material. Independently of the carbon source material, the energy gap dependences of the film properties (photoconductivity, activation energy of the dark conductivity, Urbach energy and subbandgap defect absorption) show a distinct change around EG = 2.1 eV, which is interpreted as a consequence of structural changes with increasing carbon content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Schmitt, J.P.M., Solomon, I., Tran-Quoc, H., Bullot, J., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 77–78, 849 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Solomon, I., Schmitt, J.P.M., Tran-Quoc, H., Phys. Rev. B 38, 9895 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Matsuda, A., Yamaoka, T., Wolff, S., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 4025 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Beyer, W., Hager, R., Schmidbaur, H., Winterling, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 1666 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Schmidbaur, H., Hager, R., DE Patent No. 3941997 (10 September 90)Google Scholar
6. Li, Y.M., Fieselmann, B.F., Catalano, A., Proc. 22nd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, (Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 1991), p. 1231 Google Scholar
7. Beyer, W., Wagner, H., Mell, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 49, 189 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Liedtke, S., Jahn, K., Finger, F., Fuhs, W., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 97+98, 10831086 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Solomon, I., private communication (1992)Google Scholar