Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T21:52:03.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compatibilizers made from Copolymers that Exhibit Strong Interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Barry J. Bauer
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Da-Wei Liu
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Get access

Abstract

Random copolymers of poly(methyl methacrylate-d8) (PMMA) and poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) were synthesized and blended with polyethylene oxide (PEO), and SANS was used to estimate the strength of interaction between the various polymer pairs. The addition of PMAA greatly reduced the scattering of the blend, giving a large negative Flory-Huggins interaction parameter. Copolymers of the type PMAA-g-PS, PMAA-r-PS, PMMA-g-PS, and PMMA-r-PS (g = graft, r = random) were used as compatibilizers for the melt blending of mixtures containing 80% PS and 20% PEO. Random copolymers containing half PMMA and half PS or half PMAA and half PS were ineffective compatibilizers while graft copolymers of these polymers produced a much finer dispersion of PEO in PS when blended at 190°C. Graft copolymers made with 90% PS were different, however, with PMMA grafts having only a small effect, while PMAA grafts having a large effect. Random and graft copolymers of PS and PMMA were also used to compatibilize blends of PS and PMMA. The results were similar to the same compatibilizers with blends of PS and PEO, with the graft copolymer causing a finer dispersion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Utraki, L. A., Polymer Alloys and Blends, Oxford University Press, 1990, New York.Google Scholar
2. Hobbie, E. K.; Bauer, B. J.; Han, C. C.; Physical Review Letters, 1994, 72, 1830.Google Scholar
3. Hobbie, E. K.; Merkle, G.; Bauer, B. J.; Han, C. C.; Physical Reveiw E, 1995, 52, 3256.Google Scholar
4. Ito, H.; Russell, T. P.; Wignall, G. D.; Macromolecules, 1987, 20, 2213.Google Scholar
5. Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified in this paper in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply recommendation by the National Institute of Standards and Technology nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for this purpose.Google Scholar
6. ten Brinke, G., Karasz, F. E.; MacKnight, W. J.; Macromolecules, 1983, 16, 1827.Google Scholar
7. Bauer, B. J.; Polym. Eng. Sci., 1985, 25, 1081.Google Scholar
8. Han, C.C., Bauer, B. J.; Clark, J.C., Muroga, Y.; Matushita, Y.; Okada, M.; Tran-Cong, Q.; Chang, T.; and Sanchez, I; Polymer, 1988, 29, 2002.Google Scholar
9. Bevington, P. R., Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1969, New York.Google Scholar
10. Benoit, H.; Wu, W.-L.; Mozer, B; Bauer, B. J.; Lapp, A., Macromolecules, 1985, 18, 986.Google Scholar