Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T07:53:59.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complex Dielectric Properties of Tooth Constituents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

James V. Masi
Affiliation:
Western New England College, Dept. of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, Springfield, MA 01119
Louis C. Masi
Affiliation:
Western New England College, Dept. of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, Springfield, MA 01119
Get access

Abstract

Due to the recently indicated causal relationship between the piezoelectric properties of teeth and the formation of root caries, a study was undertaken to further classify the dielectric properties of the actual tooth constituents. The properties considered are the real and imaginary components of the complex dielectric constant, including the electrical conductivity, for human teeth in vitro, both dry and saline solution saturated. The frequency range covered is from 1 Hz to 1.35 GHz. An attempt has been made to present the data for the two most prominent constituents, namely, enamel and dentin. Ways in which the dielectric properties can aid physiological studies and an understanding of the caries process are also described. Some possible explanations for the biological and physiological processes in the dielectric properties of tooth constituents are given. Pathological variations among teeth are noted. Some hypotheses for causal relationships between caries and electrical properties of natural dental constituents are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Nikiforuk, G., Understanding Dental Caries ( Karger Press, New York, 1985 ), p. 79 ff.Google Scholar
2. Neuman, H. H. and DiSalvo, N., J. Dent. Research 36, 286 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. McCoy, G., Oral Implant. 9, 2 (1983).Google Scholar
4. Neubrun, E. and Armitage, G., Calif. Dent. J. (Dec., 1984), p. 68.Google Scholar
5. Grippo, J. O. and Masi, J.V. in Proceedings of the 13th Northeast Bioengineering Conference, edited by K. Foster (IEEE Press, New York, 1987) pp. 93–96.Google Scholar
6. Athenstaedt, H. and Petersen, H., Zeit. fur Zellforshung 79, 592598 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bassett, C., Pilla, A., and Pawluk, R., Clin. Orthop., 124, 128143 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Brighton, C., Friedenberg, Z., Mitchell, E., and Booth, R., Clin. Orthop., 124, 106123 (1977).Google Scholar
9. Pethig, R., Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 8, (A), 512 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kosterich, J, Foster, K., and Pollack, S., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 30, (2), 8186 (1983).Google Scholar