Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T12:38:24.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlling Defect Formation in Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. S. Nandedkar*
Affiliation:
CASA (Center for Atomistic Simulations and Analysis), 15 Dartantra Dr., Hopewell Junction, NY 12533.
Get access

Abstract

Computer simulations were used to study nucleation and development of misfit dislocations in coherent films on lattice mismatched substrates. Nucleation of a misfit dislocation was characterized as insertion of vacancies in the top layer of the film, whereas further development of the misfit dislocation was accompanied by the movement of a half dislocation loop towards the interface (1). The energetics of nucleation phenomenon was studied in the presence or absence of surfactants (a Monolayer of different atoms on top of the thin film) and also under different compressive stresses. An Au/Ni film substrate system and Au films with Ni or Ag as surfactants were used for calculations. In absence of a surfactant or when the surfactant atom lattice constant was larger (Ag) than the film atoms (Au), the energy of vacancy insertion (EVI) decreased with increase in compressive strains. When the surfactant atom was smaller (Ni), EVI increased with increase in compressive strains. This should inhibit insertion of vacancies into the film and thus formation of defects such as misfit dislocations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Nandedkar, A. S., Acta Metall. Mater., Vol. 41, No. 12, 3455, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Nandedkar, A. S. et. al., Phil. Mag. A, Vol. 67–2, 391, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Halicioglu, T. and Pound, G. M., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 30, 619 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Nandedkar, A. S., Presented in MRS Fall Meeting, (1992).Google Scholar