Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:02:56.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Creation of Misfit Dislocations; A Study of InGaAs Alloys on GaAs Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Peter J Goodhew
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Liverpool, L69 3BX, England.
Philip Kightley
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Liverpool, L69 3BX, England.
Get access

Abstract

Growth onto vicinal substrates causes 60° misfit dislocations to adopt line directions away from <110> in order for them to maintain their presence within the substrate to strained layer interface. Observations show that for the growth of an on-axis [001]wafer the dislocations have a line direction, within measurement error, exactly [110] or [-110] and two sets of orthogonal dislocations are generated. When grown onto a wafer that is cut off-axis toward [010] four sets of dislocations are generated. The two sets of dislocations in each direction converge to form low angle intersections from which edge dislocations are formed. These edge dislocations can become very long by the glide out of the interface plane of the component 60° dislocations. This ‘zipping-up’ to form the edge components only occurs in one direction from the low angle point of intersection and the edge segments are exclusively generated in the buffer layer. Their density and penetration are a function of thickness and composition of the mismatched epilayer. The mechanisms by which the dislocations adopt line directions away from <110> and why they zip-up from the intersection in only one direction are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Matthews, J W J.Vac.Sci.Technol. 12 (1975) 126 Google Scholar
2 Green, G S, Tanner, B K, Barnett, S J, Emeny, M, Pitt, A D, Whitehouse, C R and Clark, G F Phil.Mag.Lett. 62 (1990) 131.Google Scholar
3 Kightley, P, Goodhew, P J, Bradley, R R and Augustus, P D, sub. J.Cryst.Growth April 1990.Google Scholar
4 Fitzgerald, E A, Ast, D G, Kirchner, P D, Pettit, G D and Woodall, J M, J.Appl.Phys. 63 (1988) 693.Google Scholar
5 Gerthsen, D, Ponce, F A and Anderson, G B, Phil.Mag. A59 (1989) 1045.Google Scholar
6 Maree, P M J, Barbour, J C, van der Veen, J F, Kavanagh, K L, Bulle-Lieuwma, CWT and Viegers, M P A, J.Appl.Phys. 62 (1987) 4413.Google Scholar
7 Gutakovskii, A K, Stenin, S I and Zakharov, B G, Phys.Stat.Sol. (a) 67 (1981) 299.Google Scholar
8 Cooman, B C De, Carter, C B, Chan, Kam Toi and Shealy, J R, Acta. Metall. 37 (1989) 2779.Google Scholar