Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T14:04:11.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystallization of Supercooled Zr41Ti14Cu12Ni10B23 Melts During Continuous Heating and Cooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Jan Schroers
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Andreas Masuhr
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Ralf Busch
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
William L. Johnson
Affiliation:
Keck Laboratory of Engineering Materials, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Get access

Abstract

The crystallization behavior of the bulk glass forming Zr41Ti14Cu12Ni10Be23 liquid was studied under different heating and cooling rates. Investigations were performed in high purity graphite crucibles since heterogeneous surface nucleation at the container walls does not effect the crystallization of the bulk sample. A rate of about 1 K/s is sufficient to circumvent crystallization of the melt while cooling from the equilibrium melt. In contrast, upon heating a rate of more than 150 K/s is necessary to avoid crystallization of Zr41Ti14Cu12Ni10Be23 samples. The difference between the critical heating and cooling rate is discussed within classical nucleation theory and diffusion limited crystal growth. The calculated difference of the critical heating and cooling rate can be explained by the fact that nuclei formed during cooling and heating are expose to different growth rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Debenedetti, P.G., Metastable Liquids, Princeton University Press, (1996).Google Scholar
[2] Inoue, A., Zhang, T. and Masumoto, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 31, 177 (1990).Google Scholar
[3] Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2342 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] Kim, Y.J., Busch, R., Johnson, W.L., Rulison, A.J. and Rhim, W.K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2136 (1994).Google Scholar
[5] Busch, R., Kim, Y.J., and Johnson, W.L, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 4039 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Busch, R., Schneider, S., Peker, A., and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1544 (1995).Google Scholar
[7] Schneider, S., Thiyagarajan, P., and Johnson, W.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68,493 (1996).Google Scholar
[8] Wiedemann, A., Keiderling, U., Macht, M. P., Wollenberger, H., Mat. Sci. Forum 225–227, 71 (1996).Google Scholar
[9] Masuhr, A., PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, (1998).Google Scholar
[10] Schroers, J., Busch, R., Masuhr, A. and Johnson, W.L., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, in press.Google Scholar
[11] Kelton, K.F., Phil. Mag. Lett. 77, 337 (1997).Google Scholar
[12] Masuhr, A., Waniuk, T.A., Busch, R. and Johnson, W.L., to be published.Google Scholar
[13] Masuhr, A., Busch, R. and Johnson, W.L., Mater. Sci. Forum 269–272, 779 (1998).Google Scholar