Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T23:27:43.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclic Oxidation Resistance of MoSi2/20v% Nb Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

D.E. Alman  and
N.S. Stoloff
D.E. Alman
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
N.S. Stoloff
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180
Get access

Abstract

The effect of Nb morphology on the 1200°C cyclic oxidation resistance of MoSi2/2Ov%Nb composites was investigated. Niobium was incorporated into MoSi2 as particles, random short fibers and continuous aligned fibers. After oxidation, it was found all that the composites had lost weight and essentially disintegrated. This was due to spalling of both the Nb2O5 scale and the MoSi2 matrix. The spalling of the matrix was a result of cracks originating from the oxidized Nb and propagating through the MoSi2 matrix. These cracks arose from two sources: (1) the volume expansion associated with the transformation of Nb to Nb2O5 and (2) the difference in thermal expansion between Nb2O5 and MoSi2. Composites with smaller diameter Nb reinforcements did not disintegrate as rapidly as composites with larger sized Nb reinforcements. This was attributed to the effect of reinforcement size on CTE mismatch cracking.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 322: Symposium F – High-Temperature Silicides and Refractory Alloys , 1993 , 255
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hing, P. and Groves, G.W., J. Mater. Sci., 1972, 7, 427 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chermant, J.L. and Osterstock, F., J. Mater. Sci., 11, 1939 (1976).Google Scholar
3. Brennen, J.J., in Special Ceramics 6, edited by Popper, P. (The British Ceramic Reserach Association, Stoke-on-Trent, 1975), pp. 123–134.Google Scholar
4. Fitzer, E. and Remmele, W., in Proc. 5th Intl. Conf on Composite Materials, ICCM-V, edited by Harrigan, W.C. Jr., Strife, J. and Dhingra, A.K. (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1985) pp. 515–530.Google Scholar
5. Deve, H.E. and Maloney, M.J., Acta Metall., 39, 2275 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Deve, H.E., Evans, A.G., Odette, G.R., Mehrabian, R., Emilliani, M.K., and Hecht, R.J., Acta Metall., 38, 1491 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Deve, H.E., Weber, C.H. and Maloney, M., Mater. Sci and Engr., A153, 668 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Meschter, P.J., Scripta Metall., 25, 521 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Rao, K.T. Venkateswara, Soboyejo, W.O. and Ritchie, R.O., Metall. Trans., 23A, 2249 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Xiao, L. and Abbaschian, R., Metall. Trans., 24A, 403 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Nardone, V.C. and Strife, J. R., Metall. Trans., 22A, 183 (1991).Google Scholar
12. Alman, D.E. and Stoloff, N.S., in Proc. Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture of Intermetallic Alloys (TMS, Warrendale, PA), to be published.Google Scholar
13. Alman, D.E. and Stoloff, N.S., in Intermetallic Matrix Composites II, edited by Miracle, D.B., Anton, D.L. and Graves, J.A. (MRS, 273, Pittsburgh, Pa, 1992), pp-247–252.Google Scholar
14. Alman, D.E., Shaw, K.G., Stoloff, N.S. and Rajan, K., Mater. Sci. and Engr., A155, 85 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kubaschewski, O. and Hopkins, B.E., J. Less-Common Metals, 2, 172 (1960).Google Scholar
16. Lu, T.C., Yang, J., Evans, A.G., Hecht, R., and Mehrabian, R., Acta Metall., 39, 1883 (1991).Google Scholar
17. Manning, W.R., Hunter, O. Jr., Calderwood, F.W. and Stacy, D.W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 55, 323 (1972).Google Scholar
18. Maloney, M.J., DARPA/ONR program review, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft, W. Palm Beach, Fl. Feb 27, 1990.Google Scholar