Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T00:17:40.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dislocation Glide in Ice Hi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Peter J. Fairbrother
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Malcolm I. Heggie
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Bob Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Exeter University, EX4 4QL, UK.
Get access

Abstract

The field of geological materials is rapidly opening up to computer modelling and ice poses stimulating new problems. The normal pressure and 0°C form of ice is ice Ih in which the oxygen sublattice is wurtzite. Imagining first that the protons occupy O–O “bond-centre” sites, it is generally believed that in ice Ih these protons are displaced along the bond direction in a correlated fashion such that each oxygen has two close protons (at about 1Å ) and two more distant ones (at about 1.7Å ). The correlated “disorder” of protons causes frustration of certain atomic movements, such as water molecule reorientation (as measured by dielectric relaxation times) and dislocation glide. Frustration can be relieved (and dislocation glide facilitated) by proton order defects, such as ionic defects, like an oxygen surrounded by only one close proton (OH) or three (H3O+), or Bjerrum defects, like an O–O link with no intervening proton (L defect) or two protons (D defect).

We present results of ab initio total energy calculations on the formation of these defects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Glen, J.W., Phys. Kondens. Mater. 7 43 (1968)Google Scholar
2. Whitworth, R.W., Paren, J.G. and Glen, J.W., Phil. Mag. 33 409 (1976)Google Scholar
3. Whitworth, R.W., Phil. Mag. A41 521 (1980)Google Scholar
4. Goodman, D.J., Frost, H.J. and Ashby, M.F., Phil. Mag. A43 665 (1981)Google Scholar
5. Whitworth, R.W., J. Phys. Chem. 87 4074 (1983)Google Scholar
6. Fukuda, A., Hondoh, T. and Higashi, A., J. de Physique 48–C1 163 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Newton, M.D., J. Phys. Chem., 87 4288 (1983)Google Scholar
8. Plummer, P.L.M., J. de Physique 48–Cl 45 (1987)Google Scholar
9. Hobbs, P.V., “Ice Physics” (Clarendon:Oxford) 142 (1974)Google Scholar