Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T17:02:21.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of Pore Sizes in White Concrete

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

G. Best ,
A. Cross ,
H. Peemoeller  and
M.M. Pintar
G. Best
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
A. Cross
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
H. Peemoeller
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
M.M. Pintar
Affiliation:
Physics Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1
Get access

Abstract

NMR is used to study the evolution of the discrete distribution of proton magnetization fractions in hydrating synthetic white cement. The results at 100 hours hydration time are modelled using a trimodel pore size distribution. A good correspondence is found between the NMR analysis and SANS results reported in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 370: Symposia Va/Vb – Microstructure of Cement-Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cement... , 1994 , 271
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. MacTavish, J.C., Miljkovic, L., Pintar, M.M., Blinc, R., and Lahajnar, G., Cem. Concr. Res. 15, 367 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Sobol, W.T., Cameron, I.G., Pintar, M.M., and Blinc, R., Phys. Rev. B, 35, 7299 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Allen, A.J., Oberthur, R.C., Pearson, D., Schofield, P., and Wilding, C.R., Phil. Mag. B, 56, 263 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Blinc, R., Lahajnar, G., Zumer, Z., and Pintar, M.M., Phys. Rev. B, 38, 2873 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Peemoeller, H and Pintar, M.M., J. Magn. Reson. 41, 358 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Miljkovic, L., MacTavish, J.C., Peemoeller, H., Corbett, J.M., Jian, J., Lasic, D.D., Pintar, M.M., Blinc, R., Lahajnar, G., and Milia, F., Manuscript to be published in Adv. in Cem. Res.Google Scholar
7. Bryant, R.G. and Shirley, W.M., Biophys. J. 32, 3 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Alford, N.M. and Double, D.D. in Adsorption at the Gas-Solid and Liquid-Solid Interface, edited by Rouquerol, J. and Sing, K.S.W. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 259–268.Google Scholar
9. Allen, A.J. and Pearson, D. in Microstructural Characteristics of Material by Non-Microscopic Techniques, Anderson, N.H. et al. , editors (5th Risco International Symposium on Metallurgy and Materials Science, 1984), pp. 175–180.Google Scholar
10. Bevington, P.R., Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1969), Chapter 11.Google Scholar