Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T20:10:59.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dopant Incorporation Efficiency in CVD Silicon Carbide Epilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. J. Larkin*
Affiliation:
NASA Lewis Research Center, MS 77-1, 21000 Brookpark Road, Cleveland, OH 44135, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In order to ensure reproducible and reliable SiC semiconductor device characteristics, controlled dopant incorporation must be accomplished. Some of the many factors which greatly influence dopant incorporation are the site-competition effect, SiC(0001) substrate polarity, substrate temperature, and the dopant-source reactor concentration. In this paper, dopant incorporation is considered and compared for various dopants in the context of dopant incorporation efficiency. By using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), the relative dopant incorporation efficiencies were calculated by dividing the SIMS determined dopant concentration in the resulting epitaxial layer by the intentional gas phase dopant concentration used during the SiC CVD. Specifically, the relative magnitudes of dopant incorporation efficiencies for nitrogen, phosphorus, and boron in 6H-SiC (0001) Si-face epitaxial layers are compared as a function of the site-competition effect and the dopant-source reactor concentrations. This serves as a first approximation for comparison of the relative “doping potencies” of some common dopants used in SiC CVD epitaxial growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Neudeck, P. G., Journal of Electronic Materials, 24 (4), 283288 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Baliga, B. J., IEEE Spectrum, 32 (7), 3449 (1995).Google Scholar
3 Baliga, B. J., Microelectronic Engineering, 28 (1–4), 177184 (1995).Google Scholar
4 Bhatnagar, M. and Baliga, B. J., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 40 (3), 645655 (1993).Google Scholar
5 Weitzel, C. E., IEEE Electron Device Lett., 16 (10), 451453 (1995).Google Scholar
6 Carlin, C. M. and Ray, J. K., in Second International High Temperature Electronics Conference, edited by King, D. B. and Thome, F. V. (Charlotte, NC, 1994), p. 119 to 1.Google Scholar
7 Przybylko, S. J., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics from Washington, DC (1993).Google Scholar
8 Nieberding, W. C. and Powell, J. A., IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, 29 (2), 103106 (1982).Google Scholar
9 Larkin, D. J., Neudeck, P. G., Powell, J. A., and Matus, L. G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65 (13), 16591661 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Larkin, D. J., Neudeck, P. G., Powell, J. A., and Matus, L. G., in Silicon Carbide and Related Materials: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, edited by Spencer, M. G., et al. (IOP Publishing, Bristol, United Kingdom, 1994), Institute of Physics Conference Series, No. 137, p. 5154.Google Scholar
11 Larkin, D. J., Sridhara, S. G., Devaty, R. P., and Choyke, W. J., Journal of Electronic Materials, 24 (4), 289294 (1995).Google Scholar
12 Kimoto, T., Itoh, A., and Matsunami, H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67 (16), 23852387 (1995).Google Scholar
13 Larkin, D. J., in 6th International Conference on Silicon Carbide and Related Materials, (Kyoto, Japan, 1995).Google Scholar
14 Cree Research, Inc., 2810 Meridian Parkway, Suite 176, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
15 Powell, J. A., Matus, L. G., and Kuczmarski, M. A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134 (6), 15581565 (1987).Google Scholar
16 Powell, J. A., Larkin, D. J., Matus, L. G., Choyke, W. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Henderson, L., Yoganathan, M., Yang, J., and Pirouz, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 56 (15), 14421444 (1990).Google Scholar
17 SIMS Charles Evans & Associates, 301 Chesapeake Drive, Redwood City, CA.Google Scholar
18 NOTE (It should be noted, however, that this N incorporation efficiency represents an upper bound because of the potentially significant atmospheric-N background contributions for these SIMS determined epilayer concentrations of N in the < 1–2×1017cm-3 range).Google Scholar
19 Purcell, K. F. and Kotz, J. C., Inorganic Chemistry, (W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1977).Google Scholar
20 Davis, R. F. and Glass, J. T., The Growth and Characterization of Silicon Carbide and Diamond for Microelectronic Applications, in Advances in Solid-State Chemistry, Catlow, C. R. A., Editor. 1991, JAI Press Ltd.: London. p. 1111.Google Scholar
21 Choyke, W. J.,, in The Physics and Chemistry of Carbides, Nitrides, and Borides. 1990, Kluwer: Dordrecht. p. 863.Google Scholar
22 Karmann, S., Cioccio, L. D., Blanchard, B., Ouisse, T., Muyard, D., and Jaussaud, C., Materials Science and Engineering B, B29, 134137 (1995).Google Scholar