Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T13:52:33.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dose-Dependence of Pb-Ion Implantation Damage in Zirconolite, Hollandite, and Zircon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. J. Headley
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
G. W. Arnold
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
C. J. M. Northrup
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
Get access

Extract

The long-term stability of nuclear waste forms is an important consideration in their selection for safe disposal of radioactive waste. Stability against long-term radiation damage is particularly difficult to assess by short-term laboratory experiments. Much of the displacement damage in high-level waste forms will be generated by heavy recoil nuclei emitted during the α-decay process of long-lived actinide elements. Hence, an accelerated aging test which reliably simulates the α-recoil damage accumulated during thousands of years of storage is desirable. One recent approach to this simulation is to implant the waste form with heavy Pb-ions.I- 6 If the validity of this approach is to be fully assessed, two important questions which have not yet been investigated must be answered.(1) Is the structural damage, including cumulative effects, similar for irradiation by Pb-ions and a-recoil nuclei in a given material? (2) Is the dose-dependence of the accumulated damage similar? The purpose of this investigation was to assess the extent of these similarities in selected materials. We utilized transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to characterize the radiation damage and measure its dose-dependence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This work performed at Sandia National Laboratories supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-76DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. Dran, J. C., Langevin, Y., Maurette, M. and Petit, J. C., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 2, Northrup, C. J. M., Ed., Plenum Press, New York (1980), p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dran, J. C. and Petit, J. C., Science, Vol. 209, (1980), p. 1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dran, J. C., Maurette, M., Petit, J. C. and Vassent, B., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 3, Moore, J. G., Ed., Plenum Press, New York, (1981), p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Northrup, C. J. M., Arnold, G. W. and Headley, T. J., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol.6 , Topp, S., Ed., Elsevier-North Holland, New York, (1982) in press.Google Scholar
5. Dran, J. C., Langevin, Y., Maurette, M. and Petit, J. C., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 6, Topp, S., Ed., Elsevier-North Holland, New York, (1982) in press.Google Scholar
6. Dran, J. C., Maurette, M., Petit, J. C. and Vassent, B., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 6 , Topp, S., Ed., Elsevier-North Holland, New York, (1982) in press.Google Scholar
7. Dosch, R. G., in Radioactive Waste in Geologic Storage, Fried, S., Ed., Amer. Cer. Soc. Symp. Series No. 100, (1979), p. 129.Google Scholar
8. Dosch, R. G., Lynch, A. W., Headley, T. J. and Hlava, P. F., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 3, Moore, J. G., Ed., Plenum Press, New York, (1981), p. 123.Google Scholar
9. Ringwood, A. E., Kesson, S. E., Ware, N. G., Hibberson, W. and Major, A., Nature, Vol. 278, (1979), p. 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Brice, D. K., Radiation Effects, Vol. 6, (1970), p. 77.Google Scholar
11. Headley, T. J., Ewing, R. C. and Haaker, R. F., Nature, Vol. 293, (1981), p. 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Headley, T. J., 39th Annual Proc. Electron Microscope Soc. America, G. W. Bailey, Ed., (1981), p. 114.Google Scholar
13. Oversby, V. M. and Ringwood, A. E., Radioactive Waste Management, Vol. 1, (1981), p. 289.Google Scholar
14. Clinard, F. W., Hobbs, L. W., Land, C. C., Peterson, D. E., Rohr, D. L. and Roof, R. B., “Alpha Decay Self-Irradiation Damage in Pu238-Substituted Zirconolite,” LA-UR81-2401, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, (1981).Google Scholar
15. Holland, H. D. and Gottfried, D., Acta Cryst., Vol. 8, (1955), p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Bursill, L. A. and McLaren, A. C., phys. stat. sol., Vol. 13, (1966), p. 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Krasnobayev, A. A., Polexhayev, Y. M., Yunikov, B. A. and Novoselov, B. K., Geochem. Int., Vol. 11, (1974), p. 195.Google Scholar
18. Morehead, F. F. and Crowder, B. L., in Ion Implantation, Eisen, F. H. and Crowder, B. L., Eds., Gordon and Breach, (1971), p. 25.Google Scholar
19. Gibbons, J. F., Johnson, W. S. and Mylroie, S. W., Projected Range Statistics, Halsted Press, (1974).Google Scholar
20. Ewing, R. C., Haaker, R. F. and Lutze, W., proceedings, this symposium.Google Scholar