Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T02:51:18.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of annealing ambient on performance and reliability of low pressure chemical vapor deposited oxides for thin film transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Bhat
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, CIS, Stanford University, Stanford, CA-94305.
A. Wang
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, CIS, Stanford University, Stanford, CA-94305.
K. C. Saraswat
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, CIS, Stanford University, Stanford, CA-94305.
Get access

Abstract

The performance and reliability of low pressure chemical vapor deposited (LPCVD) oxides subjected to oxidizing, inert and nitriding annealing ambients is characterized both at low temperature (600°C) and high temperature (950°C). The oxidizing ambient results in worse initial interface state density and charge to break down. We attribute this to the interfacial stress developed during the oxidation, due to the volume mismatch between Si and SiO2. The C-V measurements on poly-Si substrate capacitors and the charge pumping measurements on poly-Si thin film transistors (TFTs) indicate lower trap density for inert and nitriding ambients. The TFTs with inert anneal exhibit lower bias temperature instability compared to oxidizing ambient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Apte, P.P. and Saraswat, K.C., IEEE. Trans. Electron Devices, vol.41, no. 9, p. 1595, 1994.Google Scholar
2. Rafferty, C., PhD. dissertation, Stanford University, p.33, 1989.Google Scholar
3. Bhat, N., Wang, A. and Saraswat, K.C., Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol.27, p. 785, 1996.Google Scholar
4. Koyanagi, M., Wu, I., Lewis, A.G., Fuse, M. and Bruce, R., IEDM Tech. Dig., p.863, 1990.Google Scholar
5. Bhat, N., Cao, M. and Saraswat, K.C., Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, vol.26, p. 393, 1995.Google Scholar